Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Liability Shifted Back to Owner for Breach of Policy Condition. Vehicle Used for Religious Tour to Nepal Without Valid Permit Constitutes Fundamental Breach of Insurance Policy Under Section 149(2)(a)(i)(c) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where a vehicle bearing registration CG/07-LP/0342, owned by Durg Roadways Private Limited, was involved in a collision with a hill while on a religious tour from Durg to Nepal. Three persons, including driver Riaz Khan and Harish Yadav, died. The claimants, wife, children, and mother of Harish Yadav, sought compensation of Rs.48,99,776/-. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg, awarded Rs.32,67,000/- with 6% interest from the date of petition, holding the owner liable. On appeal by the owner, the High Court of Chhattisgarh reversed the Tribunal's order and held the insurer, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., liable, relying on Anil Kumar v. Roop Kumar Sharma. The insurer appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court examined whether the use of the vehicle without a valid permit for travel to Nepal constituted a fundamental breach of the insurance policy. The Court noted that the policy specifically excluded use outside India without a valid permit. Since the vehicle was used for a religious tour to Nepal without a permit, the breach was fundamental. The Court held that the insurer is not liable to pay compensation, but in the interest of justice, directed the insurer to pay the awarded amount to the claimants and then recover it from the owner. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the Tribunal's award with the modification that the insurer shall pay and recover.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Insurance - Fundamental Breach - Section 149(2)(a)(i)(c) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Use of vehicle without valid permit for travel to Nepal constitutes a fundamental breach of policy conditions, absolving insurer of liability to pay compensation to third parties - Held that the insurer is not liable to pay compensation, but may be directed to pay and recover from the owner (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation when the insured vehicle was used without a valid permit for a religious tour to Nepal, constituting a fundamental breach of the policy conditions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. High Court judgment set aside. Tribunal's award restored with modification: insurer to pay the awarded amount to claimants and then recover the same from the owner in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Fundamental breach of insurance policy
  • unauthorized use of vehicle
  • insurer's liability exclusion
  • Section 149(2)(a)(i)(c) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • pay and recover principle
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (07) 9

Civil Appeal No. of 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20645 of 2025)

2026-01-01

Sanjay Karol J.

2026 INSC 722

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Durg Roadways Private Limited & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment holding insurer liable for compensation in a motor accident claim.

Remedy Sought

Insurer sought to set aside High Court judgment and restore Tribunal's award holding owner liable.

Filing Reason

Insurer challenged High Court's reversal of Tribunal's award, arguing fundamental breach of policy due to unauthorized use of vehicle without permit for travel to Nepal.

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.32,67,000/- with 6% interest against owner; High Court reversed and held insurer liable.

Issues

Whether the use of the vehicle without a valid permit for travel to Nepal constitutes a fundamental breach of the insurance policy. Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation in case of such breach.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (insurer) argued that the vehicle was used without a valid permit for a religious tour to Nepal, which is a fundamental breach of policy conditions, absolving the insurer of liability. Respondent (owner) argued that the High Court correctly relied on Anil Kumar v. Roop Kumar Sharma to hold the insurer liable.

Ratio Decidendi

Use of a vehicle without a valid permit for travel outside India constitutes a fundamental breach of the insurance policy, and the insurer is not liable to pay compensation to third parties. However, the insurer may be directed to pay and recover from the owner in the interest of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave Granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. At the outset, we may note that the vehicle was used without a valid permit for travel to Nepal, which is a fundamental breach of the policy conditions.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before IVth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg (C.G.) in Claim Case No.1886 of 2011. Tribunal awarded compensation against owner on 30th March 2015. Owner appealed to High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, which reversed the award and held insurer liable on 4th February 2025. Insurer filed SLP before Supreme Court, which granted leave and heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 149(2)(a)(i)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Liability Shifted Back to Owner for Breach of Policy Condition. Vehicle Used for Religious Tour to Nepal Without Valid Permit Constitutes Fundamental Breach of Insurance Policy Under S...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder and Atrocities Case Due to High Court's Perfunctory Consideration of Evidence. Bail Orders Set Aside as High Court Failed to Evaluate Gravity of Offences Under Section 302 IPC and SC/ST Act, Ignoring Eyewitness Ac...