Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Yallamma, an Anganwadi worker, filed two writ petitions challenging her termination order dated 20.12.2011 and an endorsement dated 05.06.2014 rejecting her representation. She was appointed as an Anganwadi worker and her services were terminated without any enquiry or opportunity of being heard. The court found that the termination was in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The court quashed the termination order and the endorsement, directed reinstatement with continuity of service, and awarded back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement. The court also directed the respondents to pay costs of Rs. 5,000.
Headnote
A) Service Law - Termination - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 226 and 227 - Termination of an Anganwadi worker without any prior notice or enquiry is violative of principles of natural justice - Held that the impugned termination order and endorsement are liable to be quashed and the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages (Paras 1-10).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the termination of an Anganwadi worker without conducting any enquiry and without giving an opportunity of being heard is valid in law.
Final Decision
The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the termination order dated 20.12.2011 and the endorsement dated 05.06.2014, directed reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement, and awarded costs of Rs. 5,000.
Law Points
- Natural Justice
- Audi Alteram Partem
- Termination without Enquiry
- Reinstatement with Back Wages
- Anganwadi Worker
Case Details
2015 LawText (KAR) (09) 16
W.P. No. 107994/2015 C/W W.P. No. 105085/2015 (S-RES)
H.M. Dharigond (for petitioner), K. Vidyavathi (for respondents)
Yallamma D/o Karakappa Hotter
State of Karnataka, Deputy Director, Woman and Child Development Welfare Department, Koppal, Child Development Project Officer, Kustagi
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging termination order and endorsement rejecting representation.
Remedy Sought
Quashing of termination order dated 20.12.2011 and endorsement dated 05.06.2014, and reinstatement with back wages.
Filing Reason
Termination of services without any enquiry or opportunity of being heard.
Issues
Whether the termination of an Anganwadi worker without conducting any enquiry and without giving an opportunity of being heard is valid in law.
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that her services were terminated without any enquiry or opportunity of being heard, violating principles of natural justice.
Respondents argued that the termination was justified as per rules.
Ratio Decidendi
Termination of an Anganwadi worker without any prior notice or enquiry is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.
Judgment Excerpts
The petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi worker and her services were terminated without any enquiry or opportunity of being heard.
The impugned termination order and endorsement are liable to be quashed and the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
Procedural History
The petitioner filed W.P. No. 105085/2015 challenging the endorsement dated 05.06.2014 and W.P. No. 107994/2015 challenging the termination order dated 20.12.2011. Both petitions were heard together and disposed of by this common order.
Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
