High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused Already Released on Bail. Principle of parity applied under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 504, 427, 149 IPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused Nos. 3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 15, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in Crime No.10/2014 of Sirwar Police Station, Raichur, registered for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case arose from an incident on 10.01.2014 when a group of villagers assembled near Eralgadda to discuss a demolished structure, leading to a violent altercation resulting in injuries and death. The petitioners had been in custody since 11.01.2014 and their bail applications before the Sessions Court were rejected. The main contention of the petitioners was that co-accued with similar roles had already been granted bail by the same court, and they sought parity. The State opposed the bail application citing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court, after hearing both sides, noted that the petitioners had been in custody for a considerable period and that co-accused with similar allegations had been released on bail. Applying the principle of parity, the court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioners subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties, not tampering with prosecution witnesses, and not committing similar offences.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Parity - Petitioners/accused sought bail on ground that similarly situated co-accused had been granted bail by the same court - Held that where co-accused with similar role are enlarged on bail, petitioners are entitled to bail on parity, subject to conditions (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners/accused are entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the ground of parity with co-accused who have already been granted bail?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioners/accused Nos.3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 15 are ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.10/2014 (S.C.No.42/2014) of Sirwar Police Station, Raichur, subject to conditions: each shall execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial court; they shall not tamper with prosecution witnesses; they shall appear before the court on all hearing dates; they shall not commit similar offences; and they shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Parity
  • Section 439 Cr.P.C.
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 326 IPC
  • Section 324 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 427 IPC
  • Section 149 IPC
  • Section 143 IPC
  • Section 147 IPC
  • Section 148 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (01) 36

Criminal Petition No.201313/2016

2017-01-19

B.A. Patil

Sri Basavaraj Kareddy (for petitioners), Sri Prabhugouda S. Patil (HCGP for respondent)

Mallanna, Lingareddy, Anjinappa, Sharanapa, Basavaraj, Virupakshi

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Regular bail for petitioners/accused in Crime No.10/2014

Filing Reason

Petitioners were in custody since 11.01.2014 and their bail applications were rejected by the Sessions Court; they sought bail on parity with co-accused who had been granted bail.

Previous Decisions

Bail applications of petitioners were rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have already been granted bail? Whether the seriousness of the offences under Sections 302, 307 IPC disentitles the petitioners to bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel argued that co-accused with similar roles had been granted bail by the same court, and petitioners were in custody for a long period. State opposed bail citing the gravity of offences and that investigation was still pending.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of parity applies when co-accused with similar roles and allegations have been granted bail; long incarceration and absence of criminal antecedents also weigh in favor of granting bail.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 15 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in Crime No.10/2014 of Sirwar Police Station, Raichur, (S.C.No.42/2014) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 427 r/w Section 149 of IPC. The petitioners have been in custody from 11.01.2014. The co-accused who are similarly situated have been enlarged on bail. Hence, on the ground of parity, the petitioners are entitled to be enlarged on bail.

Procedural History

The petitioners were arrested on 11.01.2014 in connection with Crime No.10/2014. Their bail applications before the Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur were rejected. They then filed the present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, which was heard and allowed on 19.01.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 147, 148, 504, 323, 324, 326, 307, 302, 427, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was set aside as the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reaso...