Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging State's Power to Collect Royalty on Minor Minerals. State Government has authority to impose penalty for default in payment of royalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging the power of the State Government of Maharashtra to collect royalty on minor minerals and to impose penalty for default in payment. The petitioners, M/s. Vijay Constructions and Sham Mangaldas Manwani, contended that under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the rules framed thereunder, the State has no power to collect royalty. They challenged notices issued by revenue authorities for recovery of royalty and penalty, and sought quashing of those orders and seizure of trucks. The court considered the provisions of the Act and the Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963. The court held that the State Government does have the power to collect royalty on minor minerals and to impose penalty for default. The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the validity of the notices and the State's authority.

Headnote

A) Mines and Minerals - Royalty on Minor Minerals - Power of State Government - The State Government has the power to collect royalty in respect of minor minerals under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963. The court held that the State is entitled to recover royalty and impose penalty for default. (Paras 1-3)

B) Mines and Minerals - Penalty for Default in Payment of Royalty - Validity - The State Government can impose penalty on persons who have committed default in making payment of royalty. The notices issued by the respondent for recovery of royalty and penalty amount are valid. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government has the power to collect royalty in respect of minor minerals and to impose penalty on persons who have committed default in making payment of royalty.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The notices issued by the respondent for recovery of royalty and penalty amount are upheld.

Law Points

  • State Government has power to collect royalty on minor minerals
  • State Government can impose penalty for default in payment of royalty
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act
  • 1957 does not bar State from collecting royalty
  • Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules
  • 1963 valid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 4

Writ Petition No. 3015 of 2000 and Writ Petition No. 3248 of 2000

2017-07-18

T.V. Nalawade, Sangitrao S. Patil

Mr. R.M. Sharma for petitioner in WP 3015/2000, Mr. J.N. Singh for petitioner in WP 3248/2000, Mrs. P.V. Diggikar for respondent/State

M/s. Vijay Constructions and Sham Mangaldas Manwani

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the power of State Government to collect royalty on minor minerals and impose penalty for default.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notices issued by revenue authorities for recovery of royalty and penalty, and setting aside of seizure orders of trucks.

Filing Reason

Petitioners contended that State has no power to collect royalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

Issues

Whether the State Government has power to collect royalty on minor minerals. Whether the State Government can impose penalty for default in payment of royalty.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the State has no power to collect royalty. Respondent/State argued that it has power to collect royalty and impose penalty under the Act and Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Government has the power to collect royalty in respect of minor minerals and to impose penalty on persons who have committed default in making payment of royalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963.

Judgment Excerpts

In both the proceedings, the power of State Government to collect royalty in respect of minor minerals and also the power to impose penalty on the persons who have committed default in making the payment of royalty is challenged. In brief, it is the contention of the petitioners that in view of the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Rules framed thereunder, the Maharashtra State has no power to collect the royalty.

Acts & Sections

  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957:
  • Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1963:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted for Illegal Termination. Workman's Dismissal Without Proper Enquiry and Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Ex Gratia Payment Not Deductible. High Court's award of Rs. 48,00,000 with 7.5% interest held just; no interference required.