Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 17-Year-Old Student. Notional Income of Deceased Student Fixed at Rs.3,000 Per Month Instead of Rs.10,000, Applying Multiplier of 18 and Deducting 50% for Personal Expenses.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 03.05.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P. No.980/2006. The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the award of Rs.2,75,000 as compensation to the respondents, who are the parents of the deceased Sanchit, a 17-year-old student. The accident occurred on 30.08.2006 when the deceased was riding a motorcycle and a luxury bus owned by respondent No.3 and insured by the appellant collided with him, causing fatal head injuries. The Tribunal held the bus driver solely negligent and awarded compensation based on a notional income of Rs.10,000 per month, applying a multiplier of 18 and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses. The insurance company appealed, arguing that the notional income was excessive and that the deceased was contributively negligent. The High Court found that the Tribunal's assessment of income was speculative as there was no evidence of the deceased's future earnings. Relying on the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the court fixed the notional income at Rs.3,000 per month, applied a multiplier of 18, and deducted 50% for personal expenses, resulting in a loss of dependency of Rs.3,24,000. Adding Rs.5,000 for funeral expenses and Rs.10,000 for loss of estate, the total compensation was reduced to Rs.3,39,000. The court upheld the finding of no contributory negligence. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award accordingly, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Assessment of Compensation - Notional Income of Deceased Student - The Tribunal assessed notional income of a 17-year-old student at Rs.10,000 per month based on future prospects as a Class I Officer, which was held to be speculative and without evidence. The High Court reduced the notional income to Rs.3,000 per month, applying the multiplier of 18 as per Schedule II of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and deducting 50% for personal expenses, resulting in a total compensation of Rs.3,24,000 plus Rs.5,000 for funeral expenses and Rs.10,000 for loss of estate, with interest at 7.5% per annum. (Paras 5-8)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - The Tribunal found no contributory negligence on the part of the deceased motorcyclist, holding the bus driver solely negligent. The High Court upheld this finding, noting that the bus driver was charged with rash and negligent driving and the bus was on the wrong side of the road. (Para 4)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Liability of Insurer - The appellant insurance company was held jointly and severally liable with the owner of the bus to pay compensation, subject to the reduction in quantum. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal erred in assessing the notional income of the deceased student at Rs.10,000 per month and in not considering contributory negligence of the deceased?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The award of Rs.2,75,000 is modified to Rs.3,39,000. The appellant insurance company is jointly and severally liable with respondent No.3 to pay the amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

Law Points

  • Notional income of a deceased student
  • multiplier for minor
  • deduction for personal expenses
  • contributory negligence
  • joint and several liability of insurer and owner
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 207

First Appeal No.765 of 2010

2017-06-08

Smt. Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.

Shri V.P. Maldhure for Appellant, Ms. M.H. Pathade for Respondent No.1

The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Nagpur through its Regional Manager

Jagannath s/o Vasant Borikar, Chabi w/o Jagannath Borikar, Ankush Shikshan Sanstha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the quantum of compensation and finding of no contributory negligence

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur awarded Rs.2,75,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum in M.A.C.P. No.980/2006 on 03.05.2010

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing notional income of deceased student at Rs.10,000 per month? Whether the deceased was contributively negligent?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the notional income of Rs.10,000 per month was speculative and without evidence, and that the deceased was contributively negligent. Respondents argued that the deceased was a student with bright future and the Tribunal correctly assessed compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of evidence of future earnings, the notional income of a deceased student should be assessed at Rs.3,000 per month as per Schedule II of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with multiplier of 18 and deduction of 50% for personal expenses.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has assessed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.10,000 per month, which is purely speculative and without any evidence. In the absence of any evidence, the notional income of the deceased can be assessed at Rs.3,000 per month as per the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act. The finding of the Tribunal that there is no contributory negligence on the part of the deceased is correct and does not call for any interference.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur passed an award on 03.05.2010 in M.A.C.P. No.980/2006. The insurance company filed First Appeal No.765 of 2010 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and decided on 08.06.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 168, Schedule II
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows No-Fault Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Despite Deceased's Own Negligence — Volenti Non Fit Injuria Not Applicable to Section 140 Claims.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Government's Insistence on Reservation of Tenements Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Scheme. Scheme Sanctioned Under Section 21 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for Weaker Sections; Gover...