High Court Permits Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeal Under Section 260-A of IT Act, 1961 — Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn. No Substantial Question of Law Framed as Appellant Sought Withdrawal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, M/s. Filtrex Technologies Private Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru 'A' Bench dated 11/4/2018 in IT(TP)A No.469/BANG/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Sri. Chythanya K.V., filed a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The respondent was represented by Sri. K.V. Aravind. The court, after considering the reasons assigned in the memo, permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantial question of law was framed or adjudicated, and the appeal was disposed of without any order on merits.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Appeal - Withdrawal - Section 260-A, Income Tax Act, 1961 - The appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The court permitted the withdrawal for the reasons assigned in the memo and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without any adjudication on merits. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn based on the memo filed by the appellant's counsel.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Memo seeking leave to withdraw
  • No adjudication on merits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 4

I.T.A. NO.508 OF 2018

2020-07-09

Justice Alok Aradhe, Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Sri. Chythanya K.V. (for appellant), Sri. K.V. Aravind (for respondent)

M/s. Filtrex Technologies Private Limited

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru 'A' Bench passed an order dated 11/4/2018 in IT(TP)A No.469/BANG/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal for reasons assigned therein.

Ratio Decidendi

The court permitted withdrawal of the appeal based on the memo filed by the appellant's counsel, without adjudicating on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru 'A' Bench dated 11/4/2018 in IT(TP)A No.469/BANG/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Ancestral Property and Invalid Sale. Sale Deed Executed by Father Not Binding on Sons' Shares in Ancestral Property Under Hindu Law.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Permits Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeal Under Section 260-A of IT Act, 1961 — Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn. No Substantial Question of Law Framed as Appellant Sought Withdrawal.