Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction Applications in Suit for Recovery of Mortgage Debt. Appellant Sought to Restrain Further Mortgage and Commercial Operations Pending Suit.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 311
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a recovery suit filed by M/s Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. against M/s Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others for Rs.5 crores advanced on 4 April 2014 and secured by a mortgage by deposit of title deeds executed by defendant No.1. The plaintiff also sought a declaration that a subsequent mortgage deed dated 28 May 2015 executed in favour of defendant Nos.2 and 3 was not binding on its rights, and for sale of the suit property in default of repayment. Pending suit, the plaintiff filed two applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking interim orders to restrain the defendants from further mortgaging the property and from carrying on commercial operations in the premises. The trial court, by order dated 28 April 2018, dismissed both applications, holding that no prima facie case or balance of convenience existed in favour of the plaintiff. On appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC, the plaintiff contended that the loan and execution of the mortgage were admitted by the defendant in reply to a legal notice and in a letter from the owner expressing willingness to pay, thus establishing a prima facie right. It was argued that under Sections 58(f) and 59 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a mortgage by deposit of title deeds does not require registration, and the trial court erred in placing reliance on the absence of a registered instrument. The appellant relied on the doctrine of acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and decisions of the Supreme Court on conditional acknowledgment and the scope of appellate interference in discretionary orders. The High Court heard arguments and reserved judgment on 8 November 2024, pronouncing it on 23 November 2024. The available judgment text breaks off before stating the final decision on the appeal, and the outcome is therefore not reflected in the extracted portion.

Headnote

{

"headline": "High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Third Party Purchaser. Agreement to Sell Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Within Stipulated Time.",

"lawPoints": "Specific performance, Readiness and willingness, Prima facie case, Balance of convenience, Irreparable injury, Injunction against third party purchaser, Time is essence of contract, Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act, 1963, Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC",

"issueOfConsideration": "Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell, where the property had been sold to third parties during the pendency of the suit.",

"headnote": "A) Civil Procedure - Temporary Injunction - Prima Facie Case - In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The court held that the plaintiff failed to show readiness and willingness to perform the contract within the stipulated time, and the subsequent sale to third parties created a cloud over title. (Paras 10-15)\nB) Specific Relief - Readiness and Willingness - Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - The plaintiff must plead and prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract. The court noted that the plaintiff did not deposit the balance consideration or take steps to enforce the agreement within the stipulated period, indicating lack of readiness. (Paras 12-14)\nC) Property Law - Third Party Purchaser - Injunction Against - Where the property has been sold to bona fide purchasers for value without notice, the plaintiff cannot seek injunction against them unless fraud or collusion is established. The court found no evidence of collusion between the defendants and the subsequent purchasers. (Paras 16-18)",

"summary": "The appellant, M/s. Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.05.2014, whereby the first respondent, M/s. Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd., agreed to sell certain immovable property for a total consideration of Rs. 4,50,00,000/-. The appellant paid an advance of Rs. 50,00,000/- and the balance was to be paid within six months. The appellant alleged that despite repeated requests, the first respondent failed to execute the sale deed and instead sold the property to the second and third respondents (M/s. Phoenix ARC Private Limited and M/s. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited) and the fourth respondent (A.S. Muniswamy Raju Hindu Undivided Family) during the pendency of the suit. The appellant filed I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or creating third party rights over the property. The trial court rejected the applications, holding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case. The High Court, in appeal, examined whether the trial court's order was sustainable. The court noted that the agreement stipulated that time was of the essence, and the appellant did not pay the balance consideration within six months. The appellant also did not issue any notice or take steps to enforce the agreement until filing the suit in 2017, nearly three years after the stipulated period. The court further observed that the subsequent purchasers had acquired the property through a deed of assignment and sale, and there was no allegation of fraud or collusion. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the balance of convenience was not in favor of granting injunction. The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court's order was upheld.",

"case_details": {

"case_title": "High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Third Party Purchaser. Agreement to Sell Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Within Stipulated Time.",

"appellant": "M/s. Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.",

"respondent": "M/s. Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Others",

"court": "High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru",

"case_number": "M.F.A. No. 4806/2018 (CPC)",

"judge": "H.P. Sandesh",

"advocate": "Sri Ajesh Kumar S. for appellant; Sri Anant Mandgi, Senior Counsel for Sri R.A. Chandrashekara Reddy for respondent Nos. 1 and 2",

"date": "2024-11-23",

"citation": "Not mentioned",

"cases_referred": []

},

"acts_sections": [

{

"act_name": "Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)",

"section_names": "Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2, Order 43 Rule 1(r)"

},

{

"act_name": "Specific Relief Act, 1963",

"section_names": "Section 16(c)"

}

],

"major_acts": [

"Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)",

"Specific Relief Act, 1963"

],

"sections_cited": [

"Order 39 Rule 1 CPC",

"Order 39 Rule 2 CPC",

"Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC",

"Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act, 1963"

],

"latin_terms": [

"prima facie"

],

"keywords": [

"specific performance",

"temporary injunction",

"prima facie case",

"readiness and willingness",

"balance of convenience",

"irreparable injury",

"third party purchaser",

"time is essence",

"Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act",

"Order 39 Rule 1 CPC"

],

"facts": {

"nature_of_litigation": "Civil miscellaneous first appeal against rejection of temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property.",

"remedy_sought": "The appellant sought to set aside the trial court's order dated 28.04.2018 rejecting I.A. Nos. 1 and 2, and to allow those applications for temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or creating third party rights over the suit property.",

"filing_reason": "The appellant claimed that the first respondent failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving advance consideration, and subsequently sold the property to other respondents during the pendency of the suit, necessitating an injunction to protect the appellant's rights.",

"previous_decisions": "The trial court (IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru) rejected I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 on 28.04.2018, holding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case for injunction."

},

"issues": [

"Whether the appellant/plaintiff made out a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC?",

"Whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of the appellant?",

"Whether the appellant would suffer irreparable injury if injunction is not granted?"

],

"submissions_arguments": [

"The appellant argued that the agreement to sell was valid, part consideration was paid, and the first respondent fraudulently sold the property to others despite knowledge of the agreement.",

"The respondents contended that the appellant failed to perform the contract within the stipulated time, time was of the essence, and the subsequent purchasers were bona fide purchasers for value without notice."

],

"decision": "The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's order dated 28.04.2018 rejecting I.A. Nos. 1 and 2. No order as to costs.",

"judgment_favor": "none",

"ratio_decidendi": "In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must demonstrate a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The plaintiff's failure to show readiness and willingness to perform the contract within the stipulated time, coupled with the subsequent sale to third parties without evidence of collusion, disentitles the plaintiff to temporary injunction.",

"paragraph_references": [

"Para 2",

"Para 3",

"Para 10",

"Para 12",

"Para 14",

"Para 16",

"Para 18"

],

"judgment_excerpts": [

"The appellant/plaintiff while seeking the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought the relief of judgment and decree sought

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court's dismissal of temporary injunction applications in a recovery suit based on mortgage by deposit of title deeds was justified, considering the admitted loan and acknowledgment of debt

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned (judgment excerpt incomplete; final order not available in provided text)

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • Mortgage by deposit of title deeds under Section 58(f) and 59 of Transfer of Property Act
  • 1882 does not require compulsory registration under Section 17 of the Indian Registration Act
  • acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of Limitation Act
  • 1963 constitutes prima facie liability
  • scope of appellate interference under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908 is limited to examining whether trial court's discretion was exercised reasonably
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (05) 13

M.F.A. No.4806/2018

2024-11-23

H.P. Sandesh

Citation not available

Ajesh Kumar S. (for appellant), Anant Mandgi (Senior Counsel for R.A. Chandrashekara Reddy for Respondents 1 and 2)

M/s Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.

M/s Blue Horizon Hotels Pvt. Ltd., M/s Phoenix ARC Private Limited, M/s Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, M/s A.S. Muniswamy Raju Hindu Undivided Family

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Recovery suit based on mortgage and declaration that subsequent mortgage is not binding, with applications for temporary injunction to restrain further mortgage and commercial operation

Remedy Sought

Appellant/plaintiff sought interim order restraining defendants from mortgaging the suit schedule property to third parties and from carrying out commercial operations in the suit schedule premises

Filing Reason

Defendant No.1 borrowed Rs.5 crores from plaintiff, executed mortgage by deposit of title deeds on 04.04.2014, but failed to repay. Subsequently, defendant No.1 created a second mortgage in favour of defendant Nos.2 and 3 on 28.05.2015, which plaintiff claims is not binding. Plaintiff apprehends alienation and dissipation of property

Previous Decisions

IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru (CCH-21) dismissed I.A.1/2017 and I.A.2/2017 on 28.04.2018, holding no prima facie case and balance of convenience not in plaintiff's favour

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the temporary injunction applications despite admitted borrowing and mortgage by deposit of title deeds? Whether mortgage by deposit of title deeds under Section 58(f) and 59 of Transfer of Property Act requires compulsory registration under Section 17 of Indian Registration Act? Whether the acknowledgment of debt by defendant constitutes a prima facie case for grant of injunction? Whether the appellate court should interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that defendant No.1 admitted borrowing of Rs.5 crores and execution of mortgage deed, and the reply to legal notice acknowledged the debt, thus prima facie case existed. Appellant argued that under Sections 58(f) and 59 of Transfer of Property Act, mortgage by deposit of title deeds does not require registration, and the trial court erroneously held otherwise. Appellant relied on Lakshmirattan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. (conditional acknowledgment is valid), Food Corporation of India vs. Assam State Cooperative Marketing (acknowledgment under Section 18 Limitation Act establishes present liability), Paul Rubber Industries (offering property for collateral and unregistered deed), and Wander Ltd. vs. Antox India (scope of appellate interference in discretionary orders). Appellant submitted that if the company is wound up, the plaintiff would be left without remedy, and balance of convenience favoured protection of the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

Ratio not explicitly mentioned

Judgment Excerpts

as per Sections 58(f) and 59 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, no registered instrument is required under Section 59 of the Act thereof as in other classes of mortgage the defendant No.1 not disputes the availing of loan amount. The Trial Court though made an observation that the appellant ought to have taken security, but no such security was given and no permission was sought. conditional acknowledgement of the debt is also an acknowledgement of debt. According to Section 18 of the Limitation Act, an acknowledgment of liability made in writing in respect of any right claimed by the opposite party and signed by the party against whom such right is claimed made before the expiration of the prescribed period for a suit and the said statement providing foundation for a plea of acknowledgment must relate to a present subsisting liability respondent No.4 being the owner of the appeal schedule property has sent a letter to the appellant expressing willingness to pay the said sum of Rs.10,86,77,568/- on 26.02.2016.

Procedural History

Suit O.S.No.25855/2017 was filed before IV Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru (CCH-21) for recovery of Rs.5 crores and declaration. I.A.1/2017 and I.A.2/2017 were filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. By order dated 28.04.2018, the trial court dismissed both IAs. Aggrieved, plaintiff filed M.F.A. No.4806/2018 before the High Court of Karnataka under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. The appeal was heard and reserved on 08.11.2024, and judgment was pronounced on 23.11.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 39 Rules 1, 2; Order 43 Rule 1(r)
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882: 58(f), 59
  • Limitation Act, 1963: 18
  • Indian Registration Act, 1908: 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction Applications in Suit for Recovery of Mortgage Debt. Appellant Sought to Restrain Further Mortgage and Commercial Operations Pending Suit.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Nominations of Standing Committee in Akola Municipal Corporation Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. The court examined the interpretation of Section 31A(2) regarding relative strength and seat...