Bombay High Court Remands Case for Proper Inquiry Under Chapter XXV CrPC Regarding Unsoundness of Mind of Accused in Murder Trial. Trial Court Failed to Conduct Proper Inquiry as Per Sections 328, 329, 330 CrPC Before Rejecting Plea of Insanity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Firoza Fazal Shaikh, was an under-trial prisoner in Sessions Case No.300 of 2013 arising from Crime No.I34 of 2013 for offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. She was arrested on 9th May 2013. She filed an application under Section 330 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for release on bail on the ground of unsoundness of mind. The trial court rejected the application on 29th May 2014. The applicant challenged that order before the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No.6050 of 2014, which was allowed by order dated 19th December 2012 (Coram: T.V. Nalawade, J.), setting aside the order and remanding the matter to the trial court for following the procedure laid down in Chapter XXV of the CrPC. On remand, the trial court conducted a fresh inquiry and passed the impugned order dated 25th February 2016, rejecting the plea that the applicant was a person of unsound mind and incapable of making her defence. The applicant then filed the present application challenging that order. The High Court heard the parties and found that the trial court had not conducted a proper inquiry as mandated under Chapter XXV CrPC, including examination of the accused and consideration of medical evidence. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the trial court for a fresh inquiry in accordance with law, directing the trial court to expedite the inquiry and dispose of the application within two months.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Unsoundness of Mind - Inquiry under Chapter XXV CrPC - Sections 328, 329, 330 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The trial court failed to conduct a proper inquiry as per the procedure laid down in Chapter XXV CrPC, including examination of the accused and medical evidence, before rejecting the plea of unsoundness of mind. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court conducted a proper inquiry as mandated under Chapter XXV of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before rejecting the applicant's plea of unsoundness of mind and incapability of making his defence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the application, set aside the impugned order dated 25th February 2016, and remanded the matter to the trial court for a fresh inquiry in accordance with the procedure laid down in Chapter XXV of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The trial court was directed to expedite the inquiry and dispose of the application within two months.

Law Points

  • Procedure for inquiry into unsoundness of mind under Chapter XXV CrPC
  • Section 330 CrPC
  • Section 328 CrPC
  • Section 329 CrPC
  • duty of trial court to conduct proper inquiry before rejecting plea of insanity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (04) 3

Criminal Application No. 1398 of 2016

2016-04-22

Indira K. Jain, J.

Mr. Rajendra S. Deshmukh i/b Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosale for Applicant, Mr. S. D. Ghayal APP for Respondent/State, Mr. S. S. Ladda for Intervenor/Complainant

Firoza Fazal Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application challenging order rejecting plea of unsoundness of mind and bail under Section 330 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought setting aside of impugned order and release on bail or remand for proper inquiry

Filing Reason

Trial court rejected applicant's plea of unsoundness of mind without proper inquiry as per Chapter XXV CrPC

Previous Decisions

Earlier bail application (Exhibit 7) rejected on 29th May 2014; challenged in Criminal Application No.6050 of 2014, which was allowed on 19th December 2012 (sic, likely 2014) and matter remanded for following procedure under Chapter XXV CrPC; on remand, trial court passed impugned order on 25th February 2016 rejecting the plea.

Issues

Whether the trial court conducted a proper inquiry as mandated under Chapter XXV CrPC before rejecting the applicant's plea of unsoundness of mind?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the trial court did not follow the procedure under Chapter XXV CrPC and failed to examine the applicant or consider medical evidence properly. State opposed the application, supporting the trial court's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court must conduct a proper inquiry as per Chapter XXV CrPC, including examination of the accused and consideration of medical evidence, before rejecting a plea of unsoundness of mind under Section 330 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By this application, Applicant / original Accused challenges the order dated 25th February, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad below Exhibit 1 in Sessions Case No.300 of 2013. On remand Trial Court conducted enquiry afresh and vide impugned order rejected the plea raised by Accused that he is a person of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence.

Procedural History

Applicant arrested on 9th May 2013; filed bail application under Section 330 CrPC (Exhibit 7) which was rejected on 29th May 2014; challenged in Criminal Application No.6050 of 2014, allowed on 19th December 2012 (sic) with remand for following Chapter XXV CrPC; on remand, trial court passed impugned order on 25th February 2016 rejecting plea; present application filed on 22nd April 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 330, 328, 329
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Remands Case for Proper Inquiry Under Chapter XXV CrPC Regarding Unsoundness of Mind of Accused in Murder Trial. Trial Court Failed to Conduct Proper Inquiry as Per Sections 328, 329, 330 CrPC Before Rejecting Plea of Insanity.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Homicidal Death and Dowry Harassment. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that deceased died otherwise than under normal circumstance...