Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition for Re-Examination of NEET-2024 Due to Individual Grievance. The Court held that the petitioner's grievance regarding the denial of a handkerchief during the NEET exam did not merit interference.


Summary of Judgement

 
The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by Talluri Srikar, a minor, represented by his father, Talluri Srikrishna. The petitioner sought a re-examination of the NEET (UG)-2024 due to his medical condition of hyperhidrosis, which causes excessive sweating of the palms. The petitioner argued that being denied permission to carry a handkerchief inside the examination hall hindered his performance. The Court found no merit in the petition, distinguishing it from cases where candidates were granted re-examinations due to loss of exam time.

1. Parties Involved:

  • Petitioner: Talluri Srikar (Minor) through his father Talluri Srikrishna.
  • Respondents: The Director, National Testing Agency, and others.

2. Case Background:

  • The petitioner suffers from hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating of the palms) and was not allowed to carry a handkerchief during the NEET (UG)-2024 examination.
  • He argued that this restriction affected his ability to complete the exam effectively.
  • He sought re-examination, citing that 1563 other candidates were allowed a re-exam due to different issues during the same NEET exam.

3. High Court’s Decision:

  • The High Court of Telangana rejected the petition, ruling that the petitioner had been given the full time to complete the exam and that the denial of a handkerchief did not materially affect his performance.

4. Supreme Court’s Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, stating that the petitioner’s case was not comparable to the candidates who lost examination time.
  • The Court noted that while the petitioner was denied permission to carry a handkerchief, the impact was minimal since answers were recorded on an OMR sheet, and the petitioner could have wiped his hands on his clothes.
  • The Court emphasized that courts should avoid delaying the finalization of public exam results due to individual grievances.

Ratio Decidendi:

The Court emphasized that an individual's minor inconvenience during a public examination does not justify a re-examination. The petitioner’s inability to carry a handkerchief inside the examination hall did not result in a material disadvantage that warranted a fresh exam, especially since he had the full allotted time to complete the exam. Additionally, the Court stressed that granting re-examinations for individual grievances could disrupt public interest and delay the publication of exam results.


Acts and Sections Discussed:

The judgment did not explicitly reference any specific statutory provisions but dealt primarily with principles related to public examinations, individual rights versus public interest, and the courts' role in maintaining balance between the two.


Tags:

NEET-UG 2024, Supreme Court, Public Examinations, Hyperhidrosis, Special Leave Petition, Re-examination, Public Interest.

The Judgement

Case Title: TALLURI SRIKAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER TALLURI SRIKRISHNA VERSUS THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS.

Citation: 2024 LawText (SC) (9) 131

Case Number: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.20243/2024

Date of Decision: 2024-09-13