Supreme Court Upholds Full Compensation in Motor Accident Case. "No deduction for contributory negligence in accident involving abandoned truck"


Summary of Judgement

The Supreme Court of India has allowed appeals challenging the deduction of compensation based on contributory negligence in a tragic road accident. The Court held that the driver’s negligence cannot be vicariously attributed to the passengers, including the deceased and their dependents. It emphasized that the offending truck, left abandoned without warning lights, bore full responsibility for the accident. The judgment clarified that passengers cannot be held liable for a driver’s actions, overturning the findings of lower courts.

  1. Parties Involved:

    • Appellant: Sushma and other legal heirs.
    • Respondents: Nitin Ganapati Rangole, Reliance General Insurance (Insurer), IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance, and others.
  2. Incident:

    • Date: 18th August 2013.
    • Location: A highway where a car collided with a parked 14-wheeler truck.
    • Cause: The truck was left abandoned in the middle of the road without warning signs or parking lights.
    • Result: Multiple fatalities, including Sunita, Ashtavinayak Patil, Deepali, and Saiprasad Karande. Sushma, the appellant, survived but suffered grievous injuries.
  3. Lower Court Findings:

    • The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court held that both the car driver and the truck driver were responsible for the accident (50-50 contributory negligence).
    • Compensation awarded to the claimants was reduced by 50% on account of contributory negligence.
  4. Supreme Court’s Findings:

    • The truck was parked illegally and without precautionary measures, which made the truck driver fully responsible for the accident.
    • The principle of contributory negligence could not be applied to the passengers or their legal heirs.
    • The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the lower courts, ordering full compensation without deductions.

Acts and Sections Discussed:

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:

    • Section 166: Relating to claims for compensation for accidents.
    • Section 173(1): Appeals in Motor Accident Claims.
    • Section 122: Prohibition of abandonment of vehicles causing danger.
    • Section 127: Provisions for unattended vehicles causing traffic hazards.
  • Road Regulations 1989:

    • Regulation 15: Prohibits parking vehicles in a way that may cause danger or obstruction to other road users.

Ratio Decidendi:

  • Negligence and Liability: The Court held that the contributory negligence doctrine cannot be extended to passengers, as there is no basis for imputing the negligence of the driver to them. The truck driver violated multiple legal obligations by abandoning the vehicle in the middle of the road without any precautionary measures, making them solely responsible for the accident.

Subjects:

Motor accident claims, contributory negligence, vicarious liability, passenger rights, #RoadSafety #PersonalInjuryCompensation #VicariousLiability

The Judgement

Case Title: SUSHMA VERSUS NITIN GANAPATI RANGOLE & ORS.

Citation: 2024 LawText (SC) (9) 192

Case Number: CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10648 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 21172 of 2021) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10649 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 1023 of 2022) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10650 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 21248 of 2021) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10651 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 337 of 2022) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10652-10653 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 17692-17693 of 2023)

Date of Decision: 2024-09-19