Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Temporary Peon in Zilla Parishad — Termination Without Inquiry Held Illegal. Services of a project-affected person appointed as temporary peon terminated without inquiry; Labour Court and Single Judge ordered reinstatement with back wages; Letters Patent Appeal dismissed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 81
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Executive Engineer, Rehabilitation Division, Pune Zilla Parishad, against a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition challenging a Labour Court order. The respondent, Ramchandra Baban Jadhav, was appointed as a temporary peon on 10-3-1981 for a period of six months in the Rehabilitation Department of Pune Zilla Parishad. His services were terminated with effect from 31-5-1982 by a letter dated 15-5-1982 without assigning any reason and without holding any inquiry. The respondent raised an industrial dispute, which was referred to the Labour Court as Reference No.148/83. The Labour Court directed his reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages at Rs.300 per month from 1-6-1982 till the date of reinstatement. The appellant challenged this order before a Single Judge, who dismissed the writ petition and directed reinstatement within four weeks and payment of back wages as awarded. The appellant then filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench. The Division Bench, after hearing both sides, found that the Labour Court and the Single Judge had concurrently held that the termination was illegal as it was without inquiry and without any reason. The Division Bench noted that the appellant's contention that the respondent was a project-affected person and appointed on a temporary basis without selection did not justify termination without inquiry. The court held that the findings of fact were not perverse and no substantial question of law arose. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Single Judge was upheld.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Temporary Employee - Illegal Termination - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 11A - The respondent was appointed as a temporary peon for six months and his services were terminated without any inquiry or reason. The Labour Court and Single Judge held the termination illegal and ordered reinstatement with back wages at Rs.300 per month. The Division Bench upheld the order, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings. (Paras 1-3)

B) Service Law - Back Wages - Award of Back Wages - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 11A - The Labour Court awarded back wages at Rs.300 per month from the date of termination till reinstatement. The Single Judge confirmed this. The Division Bench found no reason to interfere, as the award was based on evidence and not perverse. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of a temporary employee without holding any inquiry is legal and whether the employee is entitled to reinstatement with back wages.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Order of Single Judge upheld. Appellant directed to reinstate respondent within four weeks and pay back wages at Rs.300 per month as awarded by Labour Court.

Law Points

  • Termination without inquiry is illegal
  • Temporary employee entitled to reinstatement if termination is punitive
  • Back wages can be awarded even for temporary employees
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (06) 50

Letters Patent Appeal No.83 of 2006 in Writ Petition No.3098 of 1986

2006-06-08

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, Mrs. Roshan Dalvi

Shri S.V. Marne for the Appellant, Ms Seema Sarnaik for the Respondent (No.1)

The Executive Engineer, Rehabilitation Division, Pune Zilla Parishad

Ramchandra Baban Jadhav, The Presiding Officer, IVth Labour Court, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Letters Patent Appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging Labour Court order of reinstatement with back wages.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the order of reinstatement and back wages awarded by Labour Court and confirmed by Single Judge.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by the judgment of Single Judge dismissing writ petition and confirming Labour Court order of reinstatement with back wages.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court directed reinstatement with continuity and back wages at Rs.300 per month; Single Judge dismissed writ petition and directed reinstatement within four weeks and payment of back wages.

Issues

Whether the termination of a temporary employee without inquiry is illegal? Whether the employee is entitled to reinstatement with back wages?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that respondent was appointed on temporary basis without selection and was a project-affected person, hence no grievance could be made. Respondent contended that termination was without reason and without inquiry, hence illegal.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of a temporary employee without holding any inquiry and without assigning any reason is illegal, and the employee is entitled to reinstatement with back wages. The concurrent findings of fact by the Labour Court and Single Judge, not being perverse, cannot be interfered with in appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The services of the respondent came to be terminated with effect from 31-5-1982 under the letter dated 15-5-1982. The Labour Court, however, directed the reinstatement of the respondent as Peon with continuity of services and payment of back wages at the rate of Rs.300/- per month from 1-6-1982 till the date of reinstatement. The learned single Judge while dismissing the petition directed the appellant to reinstate the respondent within four weeks from the date of the impugned order and further to pay back wages at the rate of Rs.300/- per month, as awarded by the Labour Court.

Procedural History

Respondent appointed as temporary peon on 10-3-1981 for six months; services terminated on 31-5-1982; reference made to Labour Court (Reference No.148/83); Labour Court ordered reinstatement with back wages on an unspecified date; appellant filed Writ Petition No.3098 of 1986; Single Judge dismissed writ petition on 1-8-2002; appellant filed Letters Patent Appeal No.83 of 2006; Division Bench dismissed appeal on 8-6-2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 2A, 11A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Temporary Peon in Zilla Parishad — Termination Without Inquiry Held Illegal. Services of a project-affected person appointed as temporary peon terminated without inquiry; Labour Court and Single Judge orde...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Continuation in Deaf and Dumb School Despite Withdrawal of Recognition of Training Institution. The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue in service and consider her for regularisation i...