Bombay High Court Considers Whether Arrest of Woman Accused at 8:00 p.m. Violates Section 46(4) CrPC Sunset Rule in PNB Fraud Case. Arrest After Sunset Without Prior Judicial Magistrate Permission Allegedly Renders Arrest and Remand Illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an executive assistant to Nirav Modi and authorised signatory of firms involved in an alleged fraud on Punjab National Bank, was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation at 8:00 p.m. on 20.02.2018 in connection with an FIR registered under Sections 120B, 420 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. She challenged her arrest and subsequent remand order dated 21.02.2018 as illegal, contending that the arrest violated Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits arrest of a woman after sunset and before sunrise without prior written permission of a Judicial Magistrate First Class in exceptional circumstances. The CBI opposed the petition, asserting that the petitioner was not cooperating and might abscond, and that the Special Judge had found no breach of the provision. The High Court heard the matter and reserved judgment. The provided excerpt does not contain the final decision of the court.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Arrest of Women - Mandatory Safeguard - Section 46(4) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Argument raised that arrest of a woman after sunset without prior written permission of Judicial Magistrate First Class is illegal and vitiates subsequent remand; exceptional circumstances require judicial oversight (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arrest of the petitioner at 8:00 p.m. on 20.02.2018 violated Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; whether the remand order is nullity due to illegal arrest

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Prohibition on arrest of women after sunset and before sunrise under Section 46(4) CrPC is mandatory
  • prior written permission of Judicial Magistrate First Class required for exceptional circumstances
  • arrest in violation renders subsequent remand illegal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (05) 27

WRIT PETITION NO.1142/2018

2018-05-10

S. J. Kathawalla, Smt. Bharti H. Dangre

2018:BHC-AS:13518-DB

Vijay Aggarwal, Ashul Aggarwal, Yashwardhan Tiwari, Ameeta Kuttikrushnan, Rajan Salvi

Kavita Manikikar

Central Bureau of Investigation and State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking declaration that arrest and subsequent remand are illegal due to violation of procedural safeguards under CrPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a declaration that her arrest by CBI was illegal and contrary to Section 46(4) CrPC, setting aside of the remand order dated 21.02.2018, and an inquiry against the officers who arrested her

Filing Reason

The petitioner was arrested at 8:00 p.m. on 20.02.2018 in the CBI office without prior permission of a Judicial Magistrate First Class, allegedly violating the prohibition on arrest of women after sunset

Previous Decisions

Special Judge, Greater Bombay, passed an order on 21.02.2018 remanding the petitioner to CBI custody for 14 days, despite her plea of illegal arrest

Issues

Whether the arrest of the petitioner at 20:00 hrs on 20.02.2018 violated Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Whether the remand order dated 21.02.2018 was vitiated due to the illegality of the arrest What relief, if any, should be granted

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 46(4) is a mandatory safeguard, and her arrest after sunset without exceptional circumstances or magistrate’s permission was illegal; she was cooperating with investigation and there was no urgency; the remand order was thus nullity Respondents argued that the accusations were grave, petitioner was not cooperating, and there was a strong suspicion she might abscond; the Special Judge had considered the provision and found no breach

Judgment Excerpts

It is specifically stated that she was accompanied with her husband and during investigation she was not cooperating and there was a strong suspicion that she may abscond if not arrested and therefore in order to unravel the large conspiracy in this fraud, she was placed under arrest formally and the arrest was carried out at 20:00 hrs by preparing a detailed ArrestcumPersonal Search Memo. The petitioner was called in the office of CBI on 20.02.2018 and at about 8.00 p.m. she came to be arrested.

Procedural History

FIR registered by CBI on 31.01.2018; petitioner arrested on 20.02.2018 at 20:00 hrs; produced before Special Judge on 21.02.2018 and remanded to CBI custody for 14 days; writ petition filed challenging arrest and remand.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 46(4), Section 60A
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 120B, Section 420
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Section 13(2), Section 13(1)(d)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Pension Matter — Part-Time Service Not Countable Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. Rule 11(2) and 11(4) Exclude Part-Time Employees from 50% Service Counting, and Erroneous Orders Cannot Be Perpetuated U...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Whether Arrest of Woman Accused at 8:00 p.m. Violates Section 46(4) CrPC Sunset Rule in PNB Fraud Case. Arrest After Sunset Without Prior Judicial Magistrate Permission Allegedly Renders Arrest and Remand Illegal.