Gujarat High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Suit from Gandhinagar to Ahmedabad on Grounds of Wife's Health and Convenience. Multiple pending cases between parties in Ahmedabad and health issues of wife justify transfer under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Urvashiben Vipulkumar Prajapati, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Family Suit No.479 of 2025 from the Family Court, Gandhinagar to the Family Court, Ahmedabad. The marriage between the applicant and the respondent was solemnized on 30.11.2008 at Ranip, Ahmedabad, and a son was born who stays with the respondent. Due to disputes, the applicant left the matrimonial home and resides at her parental home. The applicant has filed several criminal miscellaneous applications (Nos.481/2011, 2318/2023, 2319/2023, 214/2018, 1423/2023, 564/2025, 188/2026) and BNSS No.3767/2025 against the respondent, all pending before the Family Court, Ahmedabad. The respondent filed Family Suit No.479/2025 seeking divorce under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Family Court, Gandhinagar. The applicant sought transfer on grounds of convenience and health issues (eye vision, thyroid) making travel from Ahmedabad to Gandhinagar (35 km one way) difficult. The court, after hearing learned advocate Ms. Tejal K. Shah for the applicant, noted that the distance is not substantial but considered that multiple proceedings between the parties are already pending in Ahmedabad and that the applicant's health concerns warranted transfer. The court allowed the application, transferring Family Suit No.479/2025 from the Family Court, Gandhinagar to the Family Court, Ahmedabad, and directed the transferee court to decide the suit expeditiously in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Transfer of Suit - The applicant-wife sought transfer of divorce suit filed by husband from Gandhinagar to Ahmedabad citing health issues and multiple pending cases in Ahmedabad - Court allowed transfer considering convenience of wife and that several other proceedings between parties were pending in Ahmedabad - Held that transfer is necessary to avoid multiplicity and hardship (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Suit No.479 of 2025 pending before the Family Court, Gandhinagar should be transferred to the Family Court, Ahmedabad on the ground of convenience and health of the applicant-wife.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Family Suit No.479 of 2025 pending before the learned Family Court, Gandhinagar is ordered to be transferred to the learned Family Court, Ahmedabad. The learned Family Court, Ahmedabad is directed to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • health grounds
  • multiple pending cases at one place
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 724

R/Misc. Civil Application (For Transfer) No. 610 of 2026

2026-03-13

Devan M. Desai

2026:GUJHC:20557

Tejal K. Shah

Urvashiben Vipulkumar Prajapati

Vipulkumar Naranbhai Prajapati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous Civil Application for transfer of a family suit from one family court to another.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Family Suit No.479 of 2025 from Family Court, Gandhinagar to Family Court, Ahmedabad.

Filing Reason

Applicant-wife sought transfer due to health issues (eye vision, thyroid) and because multiple other proceedings between the parties are pending in Ahmedabad.

Issues

Whether the Family Suit No.479 of 2025 should be transferred from Gandhinagar to Ahmedabad on grounds of convenience and health of the applicant-wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that though distance between Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad is 35 km one way, due to health issues like eye vision and thyroid, it would be very difficult for the applicant to travel from Ahmedabad to Gandhinagar.

Ratio Decidendi

While considering transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife and her health conditions are relevant factors, especially when multiple proceedings between the same parties are already pending at the transferee court. Transfer is granted to avoid multiplicity and hardship.

Judgment Excerpts

The present application is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking following reliefs. With the consent of learned advocate for the applicant, the present application is taken up for final disposal. The applicant has filed present application before this Court seeking transfer of the aforesaid Family Suit from the learned Family Court, Gandhinagar to learned Family Court, Ahmedabad. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted though the distance between Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad is 35 kilometers one way but due to health issues like eye vision, thyroid etc, it would be very difficult for the applicant to travel from Gandhinagar to Ahmedabad and to attend the proceedings. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is allowed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed this Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 CPC on an unspecified date. The court heard the applicant's advocate on 13/03/2026 and disposed of the application on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per a...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Upholds Government's Rejection of Appeal Under Section 70 of Chit Funds Act, 1982, Due to Inordinate Delay of Over Three Years. Appellants Failed to Provide Convincing Reasons for Delay and Were Deemed to Have Slept Over Their Right...