Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder by Burning Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration recorded by Special Executive Magistrate with doctor's certification held reliable and sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Suresh Maruti Badgurav @ Pujari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No.85 of 1999 for the murder of his wife, Nirmalabai, by burning, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that on 26.3.1999, Nirmalabai was admitted to Central Hospital, Ulhasnagar with severe burn injuries. She was brought by a neighbour and gave a history that her husband had set her on fire. The police were informed, and a Special Executive Magistrate recorded her dying declaration in the presence of a doctor. The dying declaration, exhibited as Ex.13, was in question-answer form and bore the doctor's certification that the victim was in a fit physical and mental condition to give the statement. The accused was arrested and charged. The prosecution examined seven witnesses, including the Special Executive Magistrate (PW-1) and the doctor. The trial court, upon appreciation of evidence, convicted the accused. The appellant appealed to the High Court, arguing that the dying declaration was unreliable. The High Court, with the assistance of counsel, reappreciated the entire evidence. The court found that the dying declaration was properly recorded, with necessary certifications, and that there was no reason to disbelieve it. The court held that the dying declaration was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder by Burning - Dying Declaration - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by burning based on a dying declaration recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate. The court held that the dying declaration was reliable as it was recorded in question-answer form, with proper certification by the doctor that the victim was fit to give the statement. The court reappreciated the evidence and found no reason to disbelieve the dying declaration, thereby upholding the conviction. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration recorded by the Special Executive Magistrate is reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering his wife by burning.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Murder by burning
  • Reliability of dying declaration
  • Certification by doctor
  • Question and answer form
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 52

Criminal Appeal No. 329 of 2001

2005-04-19

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Ms. Sharimila Kaushik (appointed) for appellant, Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, APP for State

Suresh Maruti Badgurav @ Pujari

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by order of conviction and sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him

Issues

Whether the dying declaration is reliable and sufficient to convict the appellant under Section 302 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was unreliable; State argued that it was properly recorded and certified

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate in question-answer form, with proper certification by a doctor that the victim was fit to give the statement, is reliable and sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The dying declaration was recorded in question and answer form and carries all the necessary certificates and endorsements which are duly proved. We have reappreciated the entire evidence and find no reason to disbelieve the dying declaration.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No.85 of 1999 on 29.11.2000. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 19.04.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder by Burning Based on Dying Declaration. Dying declaration recorded by Special Executive Magistrate with doctor's certification held reliable and sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consent Decree Execution Dispute — Family Settlement Must Be Enforced to Give Fruits of Decree. Court Holds That Executing Court Cannot Nullify Consent Terms by Reading Implied Conditions; Direction Issued to Execute ...