Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Part-Time Employee Regularization Case — No Retrospective Monetary Benefits for Daily Wage Conversion. State Policy dated 27 February 2004 and subsequent instructions dated 22 September 2011 held binding; High Court erred in granting monetary benefits from 1 January 2007.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Himachal Pradesh against a High Court judgment that directed the State to grant monetary benefits with effect from 1 January 2007 to part-time Revenue Chowkidars who had been converted to daily wage status. The background of the case involves a State policy dated 27 February 2004, which provided that part-time Class-IV employees who completed ten years of continuous service as on 31 December 2003 would be made daily wagers with prospective effect. This policy initially did not cover Revenue Chowkidars, who were engaged by Panchayats. In a previous case, Moti Singh v. State, the High Court had directed that if daily wage status was granted retrospectively, the employee would not be entitled to any consequential monetary benefits for the past period, but the period would count for regularization. Pursuant to that, the State Government issued instructions on 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 specifically for Revenue Chowkidars, stating that wages would be paid from the date of actual appointment as daily wager, and seniority would be granted from the completion of ten years of part-time service, but without any financial benefits for the past. The respondent employees filed a writ petition seeking daily wage status with consequential benefits from 27 February 2004. The High Court, by its impugned judgment dated 20 July 2012, directed that all part-time Revenue Chowkidars who had been conferred daily wage status should be granted monetary benefits with effect from 1 January 2007. The State appealed to the Supreme Court, confining its challenge to the question of back wages. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court's direction was inconsistent with its own earlier decision in Moti Singh and with the State's policy. The Court held that once the State Government decided to bring part-time Revenue Chowkidars on a daily wage basis with the stipulation that seniority would count from completion of ten years but without past financial benefits, that principle was required to be followed. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the direction for payment of monetary benefits from 1 January 2007, and clarified that the State Government shall abide by the stipulations in the communication dated 22 September 2011, with seniority counted from the date of completion of ten years as part-time chowkidars but without any financial benefits for the past.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Part-time Employees - Daily Wage Conversion - Monetary Benefits - The State Government's policy dated 27 February 2004 provided that part-time Class-IV employees completing ten years of continuous service as on 31 December 2003 would be made daily wagers with prospective effect. The High Court's direction to grant monetary benefits from 1 January 2007 was inconsistent with the policy and with its own earlier decision in Moti Singh (supra) which held that no consequential monetary benefits would be payable for the past period. The Supreme Court set aside the direction and upheld the State's instructions dated 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 that wages would be paid from the date of actual appointment as daily wager, though seniority would count from completion of ten years of part-time service. (Paras 1-8)

B) Service Law - Part-time Employees - Revenue Chowkidars - Applicability of Policy - The policy dated 27 February 2004 applied to part-time Class-IV employees in all departments except Education and Ayurveda. Revenue Chowkidars, who were engaged by Panchayats and not appointed by the State, were not initially covered. However, the State Government issued separate instructions on 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 specifically governing Revenue Chowkidars, granting them daily wage status with seniority from completion of ten years but without past financial benefits. The Supreme Court held that these instructions were binding and the High Court erred in ignoring them. (Paras 4-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether part-time Revenue Chowkidars who were granted daily wage status are entitled to monetary benefits with effect from 1 January 2007, or only from the date of actual appointment as daily wagers without past financial benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. The direction in the impugned order for payment of monetary benefits with effect from 1 January 2007 is set aside. The State Government shall abide by the stipulations in the communication dated 22 September 2011. Seniority of part-time chowkidars granted daily wage status will be counted from the date of completion of ten years as part-time chowkidars, but without any financial benefits for the past. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Part-time employees converted to daily wage status are not entitled to retrospective monetary benefits unless policy so provides
  • Seniority may be counted from completion of ten years of part-time service without financial benefits
  • State policy decisions must be followed consistently
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (1) 111

Civil Appeal Nos. 898-900 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 37383-37385 of 2012)

2019-01-22

Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta

The State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.

Pinju Ram etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment directing payment of monetary benefits to part-time Revenue Chowkidars converted to daily wage status.

Remedy Sought

State sought to set aside the High Court's direction for payment of monetary benefits with effect from 1 January 2007.

Filing Reason

State challenged the High Court's order granting retrospective monetary benefits to part-time employees converted to daily wage status, arguing that the policy only provided for prospective effect and no past financial benefits.

Previous Decisions

Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal order dated 27 June 2006 directed daily wage employment to part-time employees completing ten years; High Court dismissed writ petition; Supreme Court dismissed SLP on 21 November 2007. In Moti Singh (CWP 2192/2011), High Court directed that if daily wage status granted retrospectively, no consequential monetary benefits. State issued instructions on 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 for Revenue Chowkidars.

Issues

Whether part-time Revenue Chowkidars converted to daily wage status are entitled to monetary benefits from 1 January 2007 or only from actual appointment as daily wager without past financial benefits.

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that the policy dated 27 February 2004 provided for prospective effect; Revenue Chowkidars were not covered by that policy; subsequent instructions dated 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 specifically provided that wages would be paid from actual appointment and no past financial benefits; High Court's direction was inconsistent with its own decision in Moti Singh. Respondent employees argued that High Court was justified as conversion to daily wage status was an administrative formality; part-time employees performed same work as daily wagers; direction for monetary benefits was sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the State Government decided to bring part-time Revenue Chowkidars on a daily wage basis with the stipulation that seniority would count from completion of ten years but without past financial benefits, that principle was required to be duly followed. The High Court erred in issuing a direction for payment of consequential monetary benefits from 1 January 2007, which was inconsistent with the State's policy and its own earlier decision in Moti Singh.

Judgment Excerpts

The initial policy of the State Government dated 27 February 2004 applied to part time class-IV employees in all departments of the State Government except for Education and Ayurveda. The Policy envisaged that upon the completion of ten years of continuous service as on 31 December 2003, these part time class-IV employees would be conferred daily wage status with prospective effect. In Moti Singh (supra), the High Court specifically held, while directing the consideration of a representation that upon the conferment of daily wage status, the employee would not be entitled to any consequential monetary benefits for the past period, but this would be counted for the purpose of regularization after completion of ten years. Having regard to this background, we are of the view, that once the State Government decided to bring part time revenue chowkidars on a daily wage basis with the added stipulation that while their seniority would count from the completion of ten years, this would be without any past financial benefits, this principle was required to be duly followed.

Procedural History

Part-time employees moved Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal seeking regularization; Tribunal directed daily wage employment on 27 June 2006. State filed writ petition which was dismissed; SLP dismissed by Supreme Court on 21 November 2007. In 2011, Moti Singh filed CWP 2192/2011; High Court directed consideration with no monetary benefits for past. State issued instructions on 22 September 2011 and 7 July 2012 for Revenue Chowkidars. Respondent Pinju Ram filed CWP 2494/2012; High Court allowed on 20 July 2012 granting monetary benefits from 1 January 2007. State appealed to Supreme Court via SLP(C) Nos. 37383-37385 of 2012; leave granted on 2 January 2013 with stay on consequential benefits. Supreme Court heard and allowed appeals on 22 January 2019.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Commodity Exchange Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice Not Established. FMC's Show Cause Notice and Inquiry Upheld as Procedurally Valid Under Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Part-Time Employee Regularization Case — No Retrospective Monetary Benefits for Daily Wage Conversion. State Policy dated 27 February 2004 and subsequent instructions dated 22 September 2011 held binding; High C...