Bombay High Court Dismisses Transfer Application in Motor Accident Claims Case — Claimants' Right to Choose Forum Under Section 166(2) MV Act Upheld. The court held that claimants residing at Akola have the option to file petitions there, and transfer to Achalpur is not warranted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Shamashuddin s/o Yusuf Ali, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under the Motor Vehicles Act seeking transfer of three Motor Accident Claim Petitions (Nos. 61/2016, 141/2016, and 142/2016) from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Akola to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Achalpur, District Amaravati. The applicant argued that the claimants were not permanent residents of Akola but resided in Gondia, Pathrot, and Daryapur respectively, and that six other related matters were already pending before the Achalpur tribunal. The non-applicants (claimants in the petitions) opposed the transfer, pointing out that under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claimants have the option to file a petition at the place where they reside, where the accident occurred, or where the business is carried on. They specifically referred to paragraph 10 of Claim Petition No. 142/2016, which stated that the claimants were residing at Akola at the time of the accident and continued to reside there. The court examined Section 166(2) and found it clear that claimants have the right to choose the forum. Since the claimants in the petitions were residing at Akola, they had validly filed the petitions there. The court dismissed the transfer application, holding that the claimants' choice of forum should be respected and that no grounds for transfer were made out.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Transfer of Claim Petitions - Section 166(2) - Option of Claimants - The court considered whether to transfer three claim petitions from Akola to Achalpur. The claimants opposed transfer, asserting their right under Section 166(2) to file at their place of residence. The court held that since the claimants reside at Akola, they have the right to choose the forum, and transfer is not warranted (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Motor Accident Claim Petitions should be transferred from Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Akola to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Achalpur.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 166(2) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 gives claimants option to file petition at place of residence
  • accident
  • or business
  • Transfer application dismissed as claimants reside at Akola.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (06) 144

Misc. Civil Application (Tr.) No. 673 of 2018

2019-06-21

M. G. Giratkar

Shri B. N. Mohta for applicant, Shri U. J. Deshpande for non-applicant nos. 1 and 2

Shamashuddin s/o Yusuf Ali

Sau. Swati w/o Alkesh Yesur, Master Kshitij Alkesh Yesur, Sheetal w/o Rajesh Vibhute, Sau. Anuradha Ganesh Shete, The New India Assurance Company Limited, Sk. Shafique s/o Sk. Rafique

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of Motor Accident Claim Petitions from one tribunal to another.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought transfer of three claim petitions from Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Akola to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Achalpur.

Filing Reason

Applicant argued that claimants are not permanent residents of Akola and that six other related matters are pending at Achalpur.

Issues

Whether the claim petitions should be transferred from Akola to Achalpur under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that claimants are not permanent residents of Akola and other related matters are pending at Achalpur. Non-applicants' counsel argued that under Section 166(2), claimants have the option to file at their place of residence, and they reside at Akola.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claimants have the option to file a claim petition at the place where they reside, where the accident occurred, or where the business is carried on. Since the claimants in the petitions reside at Akola, they have validly chosen that forum, and transfer is not warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

Subclause (2) of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is very clear. It is the option of the claimants to file petition at the place where they reside.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Misc. Civil Application (Tr.) No. 673 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking transfer of M.A.C.P. Nos. 61/2016, 141/2016, and 142/2016 from Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Akola to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Achalpur. The court heard both sides and dismissed the application on 21/6/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 166, 166(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Transfer Application in Motor Accident Claims Case — Claimants' Right to Choose Forum Under Section 166(2) MV Act Upheld. The court held that claimants residing at Akola have the option to file petitions there, and trans...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.