Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Water Body in Public Interest Litigation. Court orders expeditious action under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for restoration of Vari Poramboke land.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, K.K. Vengidusamy, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a mandamus to direct the District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, and Revenue Tahsildar of Erode District to remove encroachments from R.S. No.14/3, classified as Vari Poramboke land, situated at Kondaiyamapalaym village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District, and restore the water body to its original condition. The petitioner relied on an enquiry already initiated by the third respondent pursuant to a notice in Na.Ka. 4307/2023/A1 dated 02.04.2025. During the hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents, submitted based on written instructions from the Tahsildar that the competent authority had already issued a notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 on 04.02.2025, followed by a Section 6 notice on 06.03.2025. However, when the authorities proceeded to survey the property, they did not carry out removal of encroachments due to standing crops, and in the interregnum, the writ petition was filed. The court observed that the respondents had already initiated enforcement action and deemed it appropriate to direct them to proceed further with their action in accordance with law for removal of encroachments as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Protection of Water Bodies - Mandamus - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to remove encroachments from R.S. No.14/3, classified as Vari Poramboke land, and restore the water body to its original condition - The court noted that the respondents had already initiated enforcement action under Sections 6 and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Held that the respondents must proceed further with their action in accordance with law for removal of encroachments as expeditiously as possible (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments from a water body classified as Vari Poramboke land and restore it to its original condition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to proceed further with their action in accordance with law for removal of encroachments as expeditiously as possible. No costs.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Encroachment
  • Water body protection
  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act
  • 1905
  • Sections 6 and 7
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:701

W.P.No.1427 of 2026

2026-02-16

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:701

Mr. S. Kousik (for petitioner), Mr. T. Arun Kumar (Additional Government Pleader for respondents)

K.K. Vengidusamy

The District Collector, Erode District; The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam; The Revenue Tahsildar, Gobichettipalayam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for removal of encroachments on water body.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to remove encroachments from R.S. No.14/3, classified as Vari Poramboke land, and restore the water body to its original condition.

Filing Reason

Encroachments on a water body classified as Vari Poramboke land.

Previous Decisions

Respondents had issued notices under Sections 7 and 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 on 04.02.2025 and 06.03.2025 respectively, but removal was not carried out due to standing crops.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to remove encroachments from a water body and restore it to its original condition.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought mandamus for removal of encroachments and restoration of water body. Respondents submitted that they had already initiated action under Sections 6 and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, but removal was delayed due to standing crops.

Ratio Decidendi

When the respondents have already initiated enforcement action under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, the court may direct them to proceed expeditiously with the removal of encroachments in accordance with law.

Judgment Excerpts

the competent authority had already issued notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 on 04.02.2025 itself and thereafter, Section 6 notice was also issued on 06.03.2025. we deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to proceed further with their action in accordance with law, for removal of encroachments as expeditiously as possible.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.1427 of 2026 before the Madras High Court seeking a mandamus. The respondents had already issued notices under Sections 7 and 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 on 04.02.2025 and 06.03.2025 respectively, but removal was not carried out due to standing crops. The court disposed of the petition on 16.02.2026 directing expeditious action.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905: Section 6, Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Water Body in Public Interest Litigation. Court orders expeditious action under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 for restoration of Vari Poramboke land.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Plaintiffs' Appeal Against Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers as Defendants in Civil Suit - Sets Aside High Court and Trial Court Orders. Court Held That Plaintiffs Are Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Defendant...