High Court of Karnataka Allows Joint Trial of Two Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 219 CrPC — Same Accused, Same Transaction, Same Year. The court held that joint trial is permissible to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judgments.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Puttanagouda, was being prosecuted in two separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, namely C.C. No.2216/2021 and C.C. No.2215/2021, pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hangal. The respondent, Kubergouda, was the complainant in C.C. No.2215/2021, while Sri Channabasappa S/o Rudrappa Devihosur was the complainant in C.C. No.2216/2021. The petitioner filed an application under Section 219 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the trial court seeking a single trial of both cases, contending that the alleged offences were committed in the course of the same transaction within a span of 12 months. The trial court rejected the application by order dated 07/11/2022. The petitioner then filed a criminal revision petition (Cr.R.P. No.123/2023) before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri, which was also dismissed on 11/04/2023. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court examined the facts and found that both cases involved the same accused and that the cheques were issued in the same year and in the course of the same transaction. The court held that joint trial is permissible under Section 219 CrPC to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and the possibility of conflicting judgments. Accordingly, the High Court allowed the petition, set aside the orders of the trial court and the revisional court, and directed the trial court to try both cases jointly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Joint Trial - Section 219 CrPC - Same Transaction - The petitioner-accused sought joint trial of two cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that the offences were committed in the course of the same transaction within a span of 12 months. The trial court and revisional court rejected the application. The High Court held that the two cases arose from the same transaction and the same year, and therefore, joint trial is permissible under Section 219 CrPC to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judgments. (Paras 1-6)

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Same Transaction - The two complaints involved the same accused and the same complainant in one case, and a different complainant in the other, but both cheques were issued in the same year and in the course of the same transaction. The High Court allowed the joint trial, setting aside the orders of the courts below. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether two separate complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, involving the same accused and arising out of the same transaction, can be tried jointly under Section 219 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the criminal petition, set aside the orders dated 07/11/2022 of the trial court and 11/04/2023 of the revisional court, and directed the trial court to try both C.C. No.2216/2021 and C.C. No.2215/2021 jointly.

Law Points

  • Joint trial
  • Section 219 CrPC
  • same transaction
  • same year
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • Section 138 NI Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (04) 68

CRL.P No. 102651 of 2023

2025-04-21

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Sri. Vidyashankar G. Dalwai (for petitioner), Sri. Rajashekhar Burji and Sri. S.M. Kotambari (for respondent)

Puttanagouda S/o. Nissimagoud Patil

Kubergouda S/o. Shekarappa Kotambri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging rejection of application for joint trial under Section 219 CrPC in two cheque dishonour cases.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of orders dated 07/11/2022 and 11/04/2023 and allowance of application for joint trial of C.C. No.2216/2021 and C.C. No.2215/2021.

Filing Reason

The trial court and revisional court rejected the petitioner's application for joint trial of two cases under Section 138 NI Act, despite the offences being committed in the same transaction and same year.

Previous Decisions

Trial court order dated 07/11/2022 rejecting application under Section 219 CrPC; revisional court order dated 11/04/2023 in Cr.R.P. No.123/2023 dismissing the revision.

Issues

Whether the two cases under Section 138 NI Act can be tried jointly under Section 219 CrPC as they arise from the same transaction and same year.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the offences in both cases were committed in the course of the same transaction within a span of 12 months, warranting joint trial to avoid multiplicity and conflicting judgments. Respondent opposed the joint trial, but the judgment does not specify the grounds of opposition.

Ratio Decidendi

Joint trial under Section 219 CrPC is permissible when the offences are committed in the course of the same transaction within a span of 12 months, even if the complainants are different, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judgments.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is being prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in two cases – C.C. No.2216/2021 and C.C. No.2215/2021. The petitioner moved an application before the trial Court under Sections 219 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for a single trial of the two cases, since according to the petitioner, the alleged offences in the two cases were committed in the course of the same transaction within a span of 12 months.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application under Section 219 CrPC before the trial court (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hangal) for joint trial of C.C. No.2216/2021 and C.C. No.2215/2021. The trial court rejected the application on 07/11/2022. The petitioner then filed a criminal revision petition (Cr.R.P. No.123/2023) before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri, which was dismissed on 11/04/2023. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, which was allowed on 21/04/2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 219, 482
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Grant-in-Aid for Non-Teaching Staff Dispute. Rule 115(3) of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1949 Applies Only to Educational Bodies or Associations Conducting Multiple Schools; Denial to Single School Not Violative ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews Interim Injunction in Bottling Agreement and Trade Mark Dispute; Division Bench Restrained Licensee from Dealing with Competing Brands. Negative Covenant in 1993 Agreement and Unauthorized Share Transfer to Pepsi Affiliates Form...