High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Robbery and Extortion Case Due to Parity and Lack of Criminal Antecedents. Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 were granted bail under Section 483 BNSS / Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023, as co-accused were already enlarged on bail.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking bail for the petitioners, who were accused Nos. 3 and 4 in Crime No.112/2024 registered at Hubballi Town Police Station. The offences alleged were under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, and 312 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, relating to robbery and extortion. The petitioners, Edwin Thomas and Febin N, were residents of Kerala and had been in custody since 2024. The court noted that co-accused Nos. 1 and 2 had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court. The petitioners' counsel argued for bail on the ground of parity, emphasizing that the petitioners had no criminal antecedents and that the investigation was complete. The State opposed the bail, but the court found that the case of the petitioners was similar to that of the released co-accused. Consequently, the court allowed both petitions and granted bail to the petitioners, subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety, reporting to the police station weekly, and not tampering with evidence or leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Parity - Section 439 CrPC / Section 483 BNSS - Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 sought bail in Crime No.112/2024 for offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023 - Co-accused Nos. 1 and 2 were already granted bail by the Sessions Court - Petitioners had no criminal antecedents and were in custody since 2024 - Held that on the ground of parity, petitioners are entitled to bail subject to conditions (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 are entitled to bail in Crime No.112/2024 for offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023, pending before the I ST Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hubballi.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal petitions are allowed. Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 are ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.112/2024 of Hubballi Town Police Station, subject to conditions: executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety, appearing before the court as required, not tampering with evidence, not leaving the jurisdiction without permission, and reporting to the police station once a week.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Parity
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Section 483 BNSS
  • Section 310(2) BNS
  • Section 311 BNS
  • Section 238 BNS
  • Section 312 BNS
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (04) 58

CRL.P No. 101502 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 101503 of 2025

2025-04-29

V.Srishananda

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7038

Biju P. Raman, Pranav S. Katageri, Sampath Kumar S. Meti, Girija S. Hiremath

Edwin Thomas and Febin N

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petitions under Section 483 BNSS and Section 439 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 sought enlargement on bail in Crime No.112/2024.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were arrested and in custody since 2024 for alleged offences under Sections 310(2), 311, 238, 312 of BNS 2023.

Previous Decisions

Co-accused Nos. 1 and 2 were granted bail by the Sessions Court.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel argued that co-accused Nos. 1 and 2 were already granted bail by the Sessions Court, and the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, thus they are entitled to bail on parity. State opposed the bail petitions.

Ratio Decidendi

Where co-accused have been granted bail and the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, bail may be granted on the ground of parity, subject to conditions to ensure fair trial.

Judgment Excerpts

Since both petitions arise out of same Crime No.112/2024, they are heard together and taken up for disposal. Co-accused Nos.1 and 2 are already enlarged on bail by the Sessions Court. Petitioners are said to be having no criminal antecedents. On the ground of parity, petitioners are entitled to bail.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed separate bail petitions under Section 483 BNSS and Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, after co-accused Nos. 1 and 2 were granted bail by the Sessions Court. The petitions were heard together and disposed of on 29 April 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): 483
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS): 310(2), 311, 238, 312
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Robbery and Extortion Case Due to Parity and Lack of Criminal Antecedents. Petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 were granted bail under Section 483 BNSS / Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 310(...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse...