Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Family Court Case — Sets Aside Decree Declaring Marriage Null and Void for Lack of Jurisdiction. Family Court lacked jurisdiction to declare marriage null and void under Section 7(g) of Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 CPC as no specific provision for such declaration exists.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by the Family Court No. 4, Nagpur in Petition No. B-30/2012, which declared the marriage between the appellant Durgaiya Pocham Sullewar and respondent Aruna as null and void. The respondent Aruna had filed the petition under Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, contending that she was the legally wedded wife of Durgaiya, their marriage was solemnized on 11.07.1979, and that Durgaiya had performed a second marriage with Laxmibai during the subsistence of the first marriage. The Family Court allowed the petition and declared the marriage null and void. The appellants, Durgaiya and Laxmibai, challenged this decree on the ground that the Family Court lacked jurisdiction to pass such a declaration under the provisions invoked. The High Court examined the scope of Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, which deals with suits or proceedings for a declaration as to the validity of a marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person. The court noted that Section 7(g) only covers declarations as to the validity of a marriage or matrimonial status, but does not confer jurisdiction to declare a marriage null and void in the absence of a specific enactment providing for such relief. The court held that Section 151 CPC cannot be used to confer substantive jurisdiction where none exists. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment and decree, and dismissed the petition filed by Aruna, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Jurisdiction of Family Court - Declaration of Marriage as Null and Void - Section 7(g) Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 CPC - The Family Court does not have inherent jurisdiction under Section 7(g) read with Section 151 CPC to declare a marriage null and void in the absence of a specific provision under any enactment. The suit for declaration of marriage as null and void is not maintainable before the Family Court under the said provisions. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to declare the marriage between the appellant and respondent as null and void under Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, and dismissed the petition filed by Aruna. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Family Court
  • Declaration of marriage as null and void
  • Section 7(g) Family Courts Act
  • 1984
  • Section 151 CPC
  • Inherent powers
  • Specific relief
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (12) 99

Family Court Appeal (FCA) No.68 of 2018

2020-12-15

A. S. Chandurkar, N. B. Suryawanshi

Ms. N. A. Biala for appellants, Smt. P. M. Chandekar for respondent No.1

Shri. Durgaiya Pocham Sullewar and Shrimati Bayaka Laxmibai

Aruna w/o. Durgaiya Pocham Sullewar and The Commanding Officer, HGMC Unit, Indian Air Force (IAF)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and decree of Family Court declaring marriage null and void.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the Family Court decree declaring marriage null and void.

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the jurisdiction of Family Court to pass such decree under Section 7(g) read with Section 151 CPC.

Previous Decisions

Family Court No. 4, Nagpur in Petition No. B-30/2012 declared the marriage between Durgaiya and Aruna as null and void.

Issues

Whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to declare the marriage null and void under Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Family Court lacked jurisdiction to declare the marriage null and void under the provisions invoked. Respondent Aruna contended that the Family Court had jurisdiction under Section 7(g) read with Section 151 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

The Family Court does not have inherent jurisdiction under Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to declare a marriage null and void in the absence of a specific provision under any enactment. Section 151 CPC cannot be used to confer substantive jurisdiction where none exists.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court No. 4, Nagpur in Petition No. B-30/2012 in favour of the respondent - Aruna. The Family Court does not have inherent jurisdiction under Section 7(g) read with Section 151 CPC to declare a marriage null and void.

Procedural History

Respondent Aruna filed Petition No. B-30/2012 before Family Court No. 4, Nagpur under Section 7(g) of Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 151 CPC seeking declaration that her marriage with Durgaiya is null and void. The Family Court allowed the petition. Appellants filed Family Court Appeal No.68 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was reserved on 01/12/2020 and pronounced on 15/12/2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Family Courts Act, 1984: Section 7(g)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Family Court Case — Sets Aside Decree Declaring Marriage Null and Void for Lack of Jurisdiction. Family Court lacked jurisdiction to declare marriage null and void under Section 7(g) of Family Courts Act, 1984 rea...