Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Public Primary School Extension. The court held that failure to acquire land within 10 years of purchase notice results in deemed lapse of reservation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ramakant Vasudeo Pai, owned land bearing Survey No. 21/2/C, admeasuring 1,170.92 square meters, situated at Lonavala, Pune. The land was reserved for the extension of a public primary school in the development plan under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). The petitioner purchased the land in 1995 and later sought to develop it, but was unable to do so due to the reservation. The petitioner served a purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act on the respondent municipal council, calling upon them to acquire the land. The respondent failed to acquire the land within the statutory period of 10 years from the date of the notice. The petitioner then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservation had lapsed. The court considered the provisions of Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which provides that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within 10 years from the date of the notice, the reservation shall be deemed to have lapsed. The court found that the respondent had not taken any steps to acquire the land and that the period of 10 years had expired. The court held that the reservation had lapsed and directed the respondent to issue a final order under Section 127(2) within four weeks. The court allowed the petition and declared that the land stood released from reservation.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 127 MRTP Act - Failure to Acquire Within 10 Years - The petitioner's land was reserved for extension of a public primary school in the development plan. Despite the petitioner serving a purchase notice under Section 127, the respondent municipal council failed to acquire the land within the statutory period of 10 years. The court held that the reservation had lapsed and the land stood released from reservation. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 - Declaration of Lapsed Reservation - The court exercised its writ jurisdiction to declare that the reservation had lapsed, directing the municipal council to issue a final order under Section 127(2) of the MRTP Act within four weeks. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land for extension of a public primary school has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and declared that the reservation on the petitioner's land bearing Survey No. 21/2/C, admeasuring 1,170.92 square meters, situated at Lonavala, Pune, for extension of public primary school has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The respondent was directed to issue a final order under Section 127(2) within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • lapsing of reservation
  • failure to acquire within 10 years
  • purchase notice
  • deemed lapse
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (09) 28

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1497 OF 2020

2020-09-25

R. D. Dhanuka, Madhav J. Jamdar

2020:BHC-AS:7135-DB

Mr. Rohaan Cama, Mr. Prateek Pai a/w. Ms. Sita Kapadia, Mr. Shashwat Rai and Ms. Alefiyah Shipchandler i/b. Keystone Partners for the Petitioner; Mr. Aniruddha Garge a/w. Ms. Anushree Koparkar for the Respondent; Mrs. A. A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent/State

Ramakant Vasudeo Pai

State of Maharashtra, Lonavala Municipal Council, Chief Officer, Lonavala Municipal Council

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration that reservation on petitioner's land has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the reservation on the petitioner's land for extension of public primary school has lapsed and the land is released from reservation.

Filing Reason

The respondent municipal council failed to acquire the petitioner's land within the statutory period of 10 years after service of purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within 10 years of the purchase notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that the land was reserved for extension of public primary school and despite purchase notice, the respondent failed to acquire the land within 10 years, resulting in deemed lapse of reservation. Respondent argued that the reservation was still valid and steps were being taken for acquisition, but no evidence of acquisition within the period was provided.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within 10 years from the date of service of purchase notice, the reservation shall be deemed to have lapsed and the land shall be released from reservation. The court has the power under Article 226 to declare such lapse.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner is seeking declaration that the reservation in respect of the Petitioner’s land bearing Survey No. 21/2/C, admeasuring 1,170.92 square meters situated at village Lonavala, District Pune reserved for the purpose of extension of public primary school has lapsed as per the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petition was heard finally by consent of parties. The court reserved judgment on 17th September 2020 and pronounced on 25th September 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Higher Retirement Age for Assistant Director at Haffkine Institute. Recruitment Rules of Institute Not Binding on State Government; Age of Superannuation Governed by State Government Rules.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Closing Evidence in NI Act Case — Failure to Cross-Examine Complainant's Affidavit Does Not Automatically Close Defence Evidence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complaina...