Search Results for "Section 271(1)(c)"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Surrender of Income Was to Buy Peace, Not Concealment. Stock Difference Detected During Survey Was Not Deliberately Concealed and Related to Earlier Assessment Year.

The appellant-assessee, a partnership firm running a bar and restaurant, was subjected to a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Deletion Upheld for Bonafide Claims. Claims for deduction under Section 35D and diminution in value of shares were bonafide and not concealment, following CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Proceedings in Income Tax Case Due to Delay in Issuance of Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice Issued After 8 Years from Filing of Return Held Barred by Limitation.

The applicants, Indian Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and others, filed income tax returns for the assessment year 1992-93 on 13th September 1992. The...