Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to No Loss of Earning Capacity. Claimant's 20% disability did not result in any reduction in salary, so compensation for loss of earning capacity was set aside.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 02.06.2010 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Claim Petition No.102/2005. The claimant, Chandan Tulsidas Gauthankar, met with an accident on 10.07.2005 while riding his Hero Honda motorcycle when a Maruti car bearing registration no.GA-01-S-0566 dashed him. He sustained serious injuries resulting in 20% disability and was unable to report for duties at the Directorate of Accounts, Government of Goa for 825 days, where he was employed as a Records Sorter earning Rs. 9,427/- per month. The MACT awarded compensation of Rs. 6,28,425/- with 9% interest from the date of application. The insurance company appealed, contending that there was no evidence of rashness or negligence and that the compensation was excessive. The court examined the evidence and found that the claimant continued in government service without any reduction in salary despite the disability. The court held that compensation for loss of earning capacity cannot be awarded merely on the basis of disability percentage; actual loss of income must be proved. The court reduced the compensation by deleting the amount awarded for loss of earning capacity but upheld other heads such as pain and suffering, medical expenses, and interest rate. The appeal was partly allowed, reducing the total compensation.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Loss of Earning Capacity - Assessment - Claimant sustained 20% disability but continued in government service without reduction in salary - Held that compensation for loss of earning capacity cannot be awarded merely on basis of disability percentage; actual loss of income must be proved (Paras 6-10).

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Pain and Suffering - Quantum - MACT awarded Rs. 1,00,000 for pain and suffering - Held that amount is reasonable and not excessive (Para 11).

C) Motor Accident Compensation - Medical Expenses - Reimbursement - Claimant incurred medical expenses of Rs. 1,50,000 - Held that reimbursement of actual medical expenses is justified (Para 12).

D) Motor Accident Compensation - Interest Rate - 9% per annum - Held that interest rate of 9% from date of application till payment is reasonable (Para 13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the MACT for loss of earning capacity is excessive when the claimant continued in government service without any reduction in salary despite 20% disability.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation reduced by deleting amount awarded for loss of earning capacity. Other heads of compensation and interest rate upheld.

Law Points

  • Compensation for loss of earning capacity requires actual loss of income
  • not mere disability
  • Section 170 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 allows insurer to contest on merits if owner/driver fails to defend
  • Interest rate of 9% per annum is reasonable.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (07) 25

First Appeal No.137 of 2010

2020-07-16

M.S. Sonak, J.

2020:BHC-GOA:743-DB

Mr. A. Kakodkar for Appellant, Mr. Shivan Desai for Respondent No.1, Mr. A. R. Kantak and Mr. R. Kantak for Respondents No.2 and 3(a)

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Mr. Chandan Tulsidas Gauthankar, Mr. Amit Suresh Kande, Mr. Suresh Rajaram Kande, Smt. Supriya Suresh Kande

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation awarded to claimant

Filing Reason

Claimant filed claim petition for compensation for injuries sustained in motor accident

Previous Decisions

MACT awarded Rs. 6,28,425/- with 9% interest on 02.06.2010

Issues

Whether the compensation for loss of earning capacity is excessive when claimant continued in government service without reduction in salary Whether the MACT erred in awarding compensation without proof of actual loss of income

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no evidence of rashness or negligence and compensation was excessive Appellant argued that claimant's disability did not result in any loss of earning capacity as he continued in service with same salary Respondent argued that compensation was just and proper

Ratio Decidendi

Compensation for loss of earning capacity cannot be awarded merely on the basis of disability percentage; actual loss of income must be proved. Where claimant continues in employment without reduction in salary, no compensation for loss of earning capacity is payable.

Judgment Excerpts

In the present case, even if it is assumed that the claimant had suffered from 20% disability still, such disability, neither rendered the appellant unfit to discharge his government service nor did such disability entail reduction in any financial benefits otherwise due to the claimant. The MACT has awarded compensation for loss of earning capacity without any evidence of actual loss of income. This is not sustainable.

Procedural History

Claim Petition No.102/2005 filed by claimant before MACT, Goa. MACT awarded compensation on 02.06.2010. Insurance company filed First Appeal No.137/2010 before High Court of Bombay at Goa. Appeal heard and decided on 16.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 170
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to No Loss of Earning Capacity. Claimant's 20% disability did not result in any reduction in salary, so compensation for loss of earning capa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Single Blow Case. Lack of Intention to Cause Death and Use of Non-Lethal Weapon Led to Reduction of Offence Under Section 304 Part II IPC.