Bombay High Court Quashes State Notification Nominating Members to Gurudwara Board — State Cannot Usurp Power of General Committee Under Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1956. The court held that the State's notification nominating members without a valid proposal from the general committee was ultra vires the Act and directed the State to seek a proper panel from the general committee.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sardar Manjieeth Singh Jagan Singh, challenged a notification dated 21.06.2019 issued by the State of Maharashtra nominating members to the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shree Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Board under Section 6(1)(viii) of the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act, 1956. The petitioner contended that the notification was contrary to the Act because the power to nominate members vests in the general committee of Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan, not the State. The State had acted on a proposal from a group claiming to be the executive committee, but the general committee had not authorized any such proposal. The court examined the language of Section 6(1)(viii) and held that the State's role is limited to notifying the names submitted by the general committee; it cannot independently select or finalize names. The impugned notification was therefore ultra vires the Act. The court quashed the notification and directed the State to call upon the general committee to submit a valid panel of nominees within a reasonable time. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Statutory Interpretation - Nomination Powers - Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act, 1956 - The provision requires the State to nominate members from a panel submitted by the general committee of the Diwan; the State cannot act suo motu or on proposals from rival factions. The impugned notification was based on a proposal from a group claiming to be the executive committee but without authority from the general committee. Held that the State's action was ultra vires the Act and the notification was quashed. (Paras 2-6)

B) Administrative Law - Delegated Powers - Ultra Vires - The State's power under Section 6(1)(viii) is limited to notifying names received from the general committee; any independent selection by the State is without jurisdiction. The court directed the State to call upon the general committee to submit a valid panel. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government can nominate members to the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Board under Section 6(1)(viii) of the Act, 1956 without a valid proposal from the general committee of Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned notification dated 21.06.2019 is quashed and set aside. The State Government is directed to call upon the general committee of Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan to submit a panel of nominees under Section 6(1)(viii) within a reasonable time. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act
  • 1956
  • Power of general committee to nominate members
  • State's limited role in notification
  • Ultra vires government action
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (04) 1

Writ Petition No. 9537 of 2019

2020-04-30

S. V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant D. Kulkarni

Shri Ganesh A Gandhe, Mr. S. Jasbir Singh (for Petitioner), Shri S. B. Yawalkar (Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3), Shri R. S. Deshmukh (Senior Advocate i/by Shri Indraneel Godsay for Respondent Nos. 4 to 7), Shri S. S. Choudhari (for Respondent No. 8)

Sardar Manjieeth Singh Jagan Singh

The State of Maharashtra, District Collector Nanded, Assistant Charity Commissioner Nanded, Sardar Gurucharan Singh, Sardar Sardul Singh, Sardar Bahginder Singh, Sardar Jagwir Singh, Shersingh Hirasingh Fauji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a State notification nominating members to a Gurudwara Board under a special Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the notification dated 21.06.2019 and direction to the State to act in accordance with Section 6(1)(viii) of the Act.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that the State Government nominated members to the Board without a valid proposal from the general committee of the Diwan, contrary to the Act.

Issues

Whether the State Government can nominate members under Section 6(1)(viii) without a proposal from the general committee of the Diwan. Whether the impugned notification is ultra vires the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The general committee alone has power to nominate members; the State cannot act on its own or on proposals from unauthorized groups. Respondents: The State acted on a proposal from the executive committee of the Diwan, which is competent to submit names.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 6(1)(viii) of the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1956, the State Government's power to nominate members to the Board is contingent upon receiving a panel from the general committee of the Diwan. The State cannot independently select or finalize names; any such action is ultra vires the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The general committee has powers to nominate members to the board. The Government cannot finalize the names on their own or on the basis of proposal received by different persons claiming their position in Diwan as members of the Executive Committee. The impugned notification is contrary to Section 6(1)(viii) of the Act 1956.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2019. The court heard the matter and closed it for order on 13.02.2020, with the order pronounced on 30.04.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act, 1956: Section 6(1)(viii)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes State Notification Nominating Members to Gurudwara Board — State Cannot Usurp Power of General Committee Under Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1956. The court held that the State's notification nominating ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds 14-Year Sentence for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on Minor. Evidence of Child Victim and Mother Found Credible, Corroborated by Medical and DNA Evidence, Conviction Under S...