Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation in Labour Dispute, Upholds Industrial Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Workman Without Compliance of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, After Completion of 240 Days of Service, Held Illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon, which directed reinstatement of the workman, Shamrao Deochand Pawar, with continuity of service and back wages. The workman had been employed as a labourer and had completed 240 days of service. His termination was effected without compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which requires notice or compensation in lieu thereof. The Industrial Court found the termination illegal and ordered reinstatement. The Corporation initially filed a writ petition which was dismissed by a judgment dated 20/09/2019, relying on a Division Bench order in an identical matter, Ulsha Sonu Pawar v. Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (Writ Petition No. 13245/2018). Subsequently, the Corporation filed a Civil Application No. 15120/2019 seeking leave to deposit Rs. 25,42,000/- with the Registrar of the Court. The Court noted that the facts and circumstances were identical to Ulsha's case and dismissed the petition, discharging the Rule. The Court held that the Industrial Court's order was justified and no interference was warranted. The Civil Application was also disposed of as infructuous.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Reinstatement - Back Wages - Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Workman completed 240 days of service and termination was without notice or compensation - Industrial Court directed reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages - Held that the order was justified and no interference warranted (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Industrial Court was justified in directing reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages to the workman who had completed 240 days of service and whose termination was without compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. Civil Application No. 15120/2019 is disposed of as infructuous.

Law Points

  • Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Reinstatement with back wages
  • Continuity of service
  • 240 days of service
  • Termination without notice or compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (03) 12

Writ Petition No. 626 of 2002 with Civil Application No. 15120 of 2019

2020-03-05

Ravindra V. Ghuge

Shri D. R. Shelke and Ms. S. D. Shelke for Petitioners, Shri G. J. Karne for Respondent/s

Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation, Jalgaon, Through: 1. The Superintending Engineer, Jalgaon Irrigation Project, Circle, Jalgaon. 2. The Executive Engineer, Jalgaon Medium Project, Jalgaon. 3. Sub-Divisional Engineer, Tondapur Dam Sub-Division, Tq. Jamner, Now shifted to Erandol, Tq. Erandol, Dist. Jalgaon.

1. Shri Shamrao Deochand Pawar, R/o Tondapur, Tondapur Dam Sub-Dv. Tondapur, Tal. Jamner, Dist. Jalgaon. 2. Hon'ble Member, Industrial Court, Jalgaon.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging Industrial Court order directing reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the Industrial Court order and sought leave to deposit Rs. 25,42,000/-.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the Industrial Court order on the ground that the workman was not entitled to reinstatement with back wages.

Previous Decisions

The petition was earlier dismissed by judgment dated 20/09/2019, relying on a Division Bench order in Ulsha Sonu Pawar v. Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (Writ Petition No. 13245/2018).

Issues

Whether the Industrial Court was justified in directing reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages to the workman who had completed 240 days of service and whose termination was without compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the workman was not entitled to reinstatement with back wages. Respondent workman supported the Industrial Court order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Industrial Court's order directing reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages was justified as the workman had completed 240 days of service and termination was without compliance of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts being identical to Ulsha Sonu Pawar's case, no interference was warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition was earlier decided by judgment dated 20/09/2019. As it was pointed out that the facts and circumstances in Ulsha were identical to the present case, this petition was dismissed and Rule was discharged. The Petitioner Tapi Irrigation Department approached this Court with a Civil Application No. 15120/2019, requesting for leave to deposit an amount of Rs. 25,42,000/- with the learned Registrar of this Court.

Procedural History

The workman filed a complaint before the Industrial Court, which directed reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages. The Corporation filed Writ Petition No. 626/2002 challenging that order. The petition was dismissed on 20/09/2019. The Corporation then filed Civil Application No. 15120/2019 seeking leave to deposit Rs. 25,42,000/-. The present judgment disposes of both the petition and the civil application.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 25F
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation in Labour Dispute, Upholds Industrial Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Workman Without Compliance of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Breach of Contract Dispute — Payment Direction Inconsistent with Findings. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal cannot grant relief contrary to its own findings on merits, applying Section 3...