Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Electrocution Death Due to Hanging Live Wire - Negligence of Electricity Distribution Company Established Under Res Ipsa Loquitur. Court directed MSEDCL to pay Rs. 5 lakhs with interest for failure to maintain electric lines, resulting in death of an agriculturist.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Laxmibai W/o Sainath Danekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) and its Superintending Engineer, to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 18% per annum for the death of her husband, Sainath Mahadu Danekar, due to electrocution. The deceased was an agriculturist. On 21 September 2011, while returning home after agricultural work with a plow on his shoulder, he came into contact with a live electric cable that was hanging near the field of Narhari Kulkarni. He sustained severe electric shock and died. The villagers informed the police, who registered an accidental death case (A.D. Case No. 25/2011). Post-mortem confirmed death due to electric shock. The petitioner alleged negligence on the part of the respondents for failing to maintain the electric line properly. The respondents contended that the incident was an accident and that the deceased was negligent. The court applied the principle of res ipsa loquitur, holding that the hanging live wire itself indicated negligence. The court found that the respondents failed to exercise reasonable care and were liable to pay compensation. The court directed the respondents to pay Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition (2016) till realization, within eight weeks. The court also awarded costs of Rs. 10,000.

Headnote

A) Tort Law - Negligence - Strict Liability - Electricity Act, 2003, Section 161 - Compensation for Electrocution Death - Petitioner's husband died due to electrocution from a hanging live electric wire - Respondents failed to maintain the electric line properly - Court held that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies and the respondents are liable to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are liable to pay compensation for the death of petitioner's husband due to electrocution caused by a hanging live electric wire.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition (2016) till realization, within eight weeks. The court also awarded costs of Rs. 10,000.

Law Points

  • Strict liability
  • negligence
  • compensation for electrocution
  • duty of care of electricity company
  • res ipsa loquitur
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 140

Writ Petition No.3212 of 2016

2020-01-29

Sunil P. Deshmukh, B.U. Debadwar

Shri V.B. Dhage for Petitioner, Shri A.M. Gaikwad for Respondents

Laxmibai W/o Sainath Danekar

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and The Superintending Engineer, M.S.E.D.C. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation for death due to electrocution.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 18% per annum.

Filing Reason

Death of petitioner's husband due to electrocution from a hanging live electric wire, allegedly due to negligence of respondents.

Issues

Whether the respondents are liable to pay compensation for the death of petitioner's husband due to electrocution caused by a hanging live electric wire.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the death was due to the negligence of the respondents in maintaining the electric line, as the wire was hanging and live. Respondents contended that the incident was an accident and that the deceased was negligent in carrying a plow on his shoulder.

Ratio Decidendi

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies as the hanging live wire itself indicates negligence. The electricity company has a duty to maintain its lines properly and failure to do so results in strict liability for compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

The Medical Officer, who conducted the post-mortem, opined that the cause of death of Mr. Sainath was due to electric shock. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies as the hanging live wire itself indicates negligence.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compensation for the death of her husband due to electrocution. The petition was reserved on 21-01-2020 and pronounced on 29-01-2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Electricity Act, 2003: Section 161
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Electrocution Death Due to Hanging Live Wire - Negligence of Electricity Distribution Company Established Under Res Ipsa Loquitur. Court directed MSEDCL to pay Rs. 5 lakhs with interest for failure to m...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect and Refuses to Reconsider Framing of Additional Substantial Question of Law. The Court held that a coordinate bench cannot reconsider an earlier refusal to frame a substanti...