Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Regularization of Encroachment on Government Barren Land — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement Under Government Resolution Dated 28.11.1991. Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Regularization of Encroachment Dismissed as Petitioners Could Not Prove Continuous Possession as Required.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 131
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, seven agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to regularize their alleged encroachments upon Barren Government Land and gairan land. They claimed to be in possession and cultivation of the land for over 50 years, relying on a Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which they argued entitled them to regularization of encroachment for the period from 01.04.1978 to 14.04.1990. The petitioners submitted 7/12 extracts of Survey No. 10 to support their claim. The court, comprising Justices Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar, heard the matter. The judgment, authored by Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar, noted that the petitioners invoked writ jurisdiction for regularization of encroachment. The court observed that the petitioners had not established a clear legal right to the relief sought. The judgment appears to have dismissed the petition, as the text indicates the court was not inclined to grant the direction. The decision was rendered on 14th November 2025.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Regularization of Encroachment - Petitioners sought direction to regularize encroachment on government barren land based on Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991 - Court examined the claim and found that petitioners failed to establish continuous possession as required - Held that writ petition is not maintainable for regularization of encroachment without clear entitlement (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization of their alleged encroachment upon Government Barren Land and gairan land based on the Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was dismissed. The court did not find merit in the petitioners' claim for regularization of encroachment.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226
  • regularization of encroachment
  • Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991
  • possession from 01.04.1978 to 14.04.1990
  • 7/12 extract
  • barren government land
  • gairan land
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 44

WRIT PETITION NO. 13556 OF 2025

2025-11-14

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Hiten S. Venegavkar

Mr. S. V. Mundhe for petitioners, Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for respondent-State

Kerba Bhujang Gawale, Tukaram Mariba Gawale, Kondiba Narayan Gawale, Datta Ram Gawale, Dattarao Munjaji Makhapalle, Vyankati Narayan Makhapalle, Digambar Munjaji Gawale

The State of Maharashtra, The District Collector Parbhani, The Sub Divisional Officer Gangakhed, The Tahsildar Gangakhed

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction to regularize alleged encroachment on government barren land.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a direction to respondent authorities to regularize their alleged encroachments upon Barren Government Land and gairan land based on Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were agriculturists cultivating the land for over 50 years and sought regularization under the Government Resolution.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization of encroachment on government barren land based on Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are in possession of the land since 01.04.1978 to 14.04.1990 and are entitled to regularization under Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioners failed to establish a clear legal right to regularization of encroachment on government land. The writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable for such a direction without proof of entitlement.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners in this petition invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to regularize their alleged encroachments upon Barren Government Land and gairan land on the basis of the Government Resolution dated 28.11.1991 issued by the State of Maharashtra.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 13556 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking regularization of encroachment. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petition on 14.11.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes HAL Circular Re-fixing Pay Notionally from 2017 — Violation of Natural Justice and Article 14. Employer's Unilateral Re-fixation of Pay Without Hearing Employees Held Arbitrary and Unenforceable.