Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Employer for Employee's Injuries. Employer's Failure to Deposit Compensation Attracts Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the learned Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation and Judge, Eleventh Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 4th May 2013. The respondent no.1, Shamshad Shaukatali Ansari, was employed by respondent no.2, Shabuddin S. Mirza, as a driver of a tempo bearing registration no. MH-04-CP-2611. On 13th July 2006, while driving on the Malad Western Express Highway, he met with an accident and sustained serious injuries including a fracture of the right tibia condyle of the knee joint. He was initially admitted to Bhagwati Hospital and later shifted to Punit Orthopedic Surgical Hospital. The vehicle was insured with the appellant. The respondent no.1 filed an application under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, claiming compensation. The learned authority directed the appellant and respondent no.2 jointly and severally to pay Rs.2,06,668/- with interest at 12% p.a. from 13th August 2006 (30 days after the accident) till realization, and also imposed a penalty of Rs.10,000/- on respondent no.2 for delayed payment. The appellant challenged this judgment. The respondent no.2 did not appeal. The High Court heard the appeal finally at the admission stage with consent. The court considered the facts and the law. The judgment is reserved on 10th December 2019 and pronounced on 3rd January 2020. The court upheld the award, confirming the joint and several liability of the insurer and employer, and the penalty on the employer.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Employer's Liability - Joint and Several Liability - Section 4, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Employee sustained injuries while driving employer's vehicle - Insurer and employer held jointly and severally liable to pay compensation - Employer also liable to pay penalty for not depositing compensation within one month - Held that the insurer is liable to indemnify the employer and pay compensation to the employee (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-insurer is liable to pay compensation jointly and severally with the employer for injuries sustained by the employee in a motor vehicle accident during employment, and whether the employer is liable to pay penalty for delayed payment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment of the learned Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation and Judge, Eleventh Labour Court, Mumbai dated 4th May 2013 is upheld. The appellant and respondent no.2 are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.2,06,668/- with interest at 12% p.a. from 13th August 2006 till realization. Respondent no.2 is liable to pay penalty of Rs.10,000/-.

Law Points

  • Joint and several liability of insurer and employer
  • penalty for delayed payment
  • interest on compensation
  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 86

First Appeal No. 502 of 2017 with Civil Application No. 3502 of 2015

2020-01-03

R.D. Dhanuka

Ms. Harshada M. Rane for the Appellant, Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi for the Respondent in FA/502/2017 and Applicant in CAF/3502/2015

National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Shri Shamshad Shaukatali Ansari and Mr. Shabuddin S. Mirza

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against compensation award under Workmen's Compensation Act

Remedy Sought

Appellant-insurer sought to set aside the award directing joint and several payment of compensation and penalty

Filing Reason

Insurer challenged the judgment of the Labour Court awarding compensation and penalty

Previous Decisions

Labour Court directed appellant and respondent no.2 jointly and severally to pay Rs.2,06,668/- with interest and penalty of Rs.10,000/- on respondent no.2

Issues

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation jointly and severally with the employer? Whether the employer is liable to pay penalty for delayed payment?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the award was erroneous and that the insurer should not be jointly liable. Respondent no.1 supported the award and sought its confirmation.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is jointly and severally liable with the employer to pay compensation to the employee for injuries sustained during employment. The employer is liable to pay penalty for failure to deposit compensation within one month of the accident.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant (original Insurer) has impugned the judgment dated 4th May, 2013 passed by the learned Commissioner under Workmen’s Compensation and Judge, Eleventh Labour Court, Mumbai ... directing the appellant and the respondent no.2 (original opponent no.1) jointly and severally to pay sum of Rs.2,06,668/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of completion of 30 days i.e. 13th August, 2006 till its realization along with Rs.10,000/- by way of penalty to be paid by the respondent no.2 herein.

Procedural History

The respondent no.1 filed Application (WCA) No. 751/C-275 of 2006 before the Labour Court. The Labour Court passed judgment on 4th May 2013. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 502 of 2017 in the High Court. The appeal was heard finally at admission stage with consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR wa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Employer for Employee's Injuries. Employer's Failure to Deposit Compensation Attracts Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, ...