Search Results for "Employer's Liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Employer's Liability"

631 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 631 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Delayed Gratuity Under Section 8 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Employer's Dispute Over Quantum Does Not Justify Withholding Payment Beyond Prescribed Period.

20 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 27/02/2017 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Nagpur, acting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

5 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Failed to Disprove Employment Relationship and Negligence. Commissioner's award of compensation, penalty, interest, medical expenses, and costs under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 upheld.

5 Mar 2026

The present appeal was filed by the Chief Officer, Bhanvad Municipality, under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prohibitory Order Against Contractor in EPF Recovery Proceedings — Third Party Debtor Cannot Be Restrained Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 8G of EPF Act. The court held that a prohibitory order under Section 8G of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires prior determination of the debt owed by the third party to the employer, and cannot be issued solely on the basis of a recovery certificate against the employer.

18 Nov 2025

The petitioner, B.T. Kadlag Constructions, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Recovery Against Auction Purchaser in Deemed Transfer Case — Section 93-A of ESI Act Does Not Apply to Sales by Financial Corporation Under Section 29(2) of SFC Act. Auction purchaser of property from Maharashtra State Financial Corporation is not liable for prior owner's ESI arrears as the transfer is by operation of law and not by the employer.

21 Feb 2006

The petitioner, M/s. ANK Seals, a registered partnership firm, purchased a plot of land and building (U-149 in MIDC, Nagpur) in an auction sale conduc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officials in Security Guard Board Complaint — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Prosecution for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust by bank officials in relation to security guard services fails as prior sanction for acts done in official capacity was not obtained.

16 Apr 2013

The petitioners, officers of Bank of Baroda (a nationalized bank), were facing criminal proceedings initiated by the Security Guard Board for Greater ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Appellants, Setting Aside High Court Order Imposing Penalty Liability on Insurance Company Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 -- Employer Solely Liable for Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b) as Per Ved Prakash Garg Judgment

23 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Appellants, challenging the Delhi High Court's order that imposed liability for penalty under Section 4A(3)(b)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Interim Payment Not Deductible from Final Compensation Under Section 8(1) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923. Court holds that interim compensation voluntarily paid by employer cannot be deducted from the amount deposited under Section 8(1) as the Act does not provide for such deduction.

26 Sep 2013

The appeal was filed by the parents of Miss Sujata Siddharth Survase, who died in the Mangalore air crash on 22 May 2010 while working as a crew membe...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Two Companies Challenging Gratuity Payment Order — Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee's continuous service under same management entitles him to gratuity despite separate corporate identities.

22 Feb 2021

The petitioners, Varma Industrial Private Limited and IBC Knowledge Park Private Limited, challenged the order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the Assistan...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Against Gratuity Orders Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the Controlling and Appellate Authorities' decisions, finding no error in adjudicating delayed applications or in calculating gratuity based on basic wages and dearness allowance, as the employer's deposit of admitted amount waived delay objections and special allowance was not part of statutory wages.

7 Mar 2026

The dispute involved multiple writ petitions filed by an employer company and several employees concerning gratuity payments under the Payment of Grat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)