Bombay High Court Quashes Wilful Defaulter Declaration Against Directors Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served to Directors Individually, Only to Company, Rendering WDIC and Review Committee Orders Unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are directors of M/s. Universal Industrial Equipments and Technical Services Pvt. Ltd., challenged orders dated 07.12.2020 and 26.03.2021 passed by the Wilful Defaulter Identification Committee (WDIC) and the Review Committee of the State Bank of India, respectively, declaring them as wilful defaulters. The petitioners contended that the show-cause notice was issued only to the company and not to them individually, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court noted that the RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters requires a separate show-cause notice to each person sought to be declared a wilful defaulter. Since the notice was served only on the company, the petitioners were denied an opportunity to be heard. The court held that the impugned orders were unsustainable and quashed them, allowing the writ petition. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case and left it open for the bank to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Show-Cause Notice - RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters - The court held that a show-cause notice must be served individually on each person sought to be declared a wilful defaulter, and service on the company alone is insufficient. The WDIC and Review Committee orders were quashed for violating natural justice. (Paras 5-8)

B) Banking Law - Wilful Defaulter - Declaration of Directors - RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters - The court held that the Master Circular requires a separate show-cause notice to directors before declaring them wilful defaulters. Failure to do so vitiates the entire proceedings. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the declaration of petitioners as wilful defaulters is sustainable when the show-cause notice was issued only to the company and not to the petitioners individually, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the impugned orders dated 07.12.2020 and 26.03.2021 to the extent they declared the petitioners as wilful defaulters. The rule is made absolute. No order as to costs. The bank is at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • show-cause notice
  • wilful defaulter
  • RBI Master Circular
  • opportunity of hearing
  • individual notice to directors
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 134

Writ Petition No. 2281 of 2021

2021-12-01

M. S. Sonak, Pushpa V. Ganediwala

Kapil Hirani for petitioners, S. N. Kumar for respondents

Narendra Seoomal Sabnani, Ashwin Narendra Sabnani, Anita Narendra Sabnani

State Bank of India, Wilful Defaulter Identification Committee, Review Committee for Wilful Defaulters

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging declaration of petitioners as wilful defaulters by bank committees.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 07.12.2020 and 26.03.2021 declaring petitioners as wilful defaulters.

Filing Reason

Show-cause notice was issued only to the company, not to petitioners individually, violating natural justice.

Previous Decisions

WDIC order dated 07.12.2020 and Review Committee order dated 26.03.2021 declared petitioners as wilful defaulters.

Issues

Whether the declaration of petitioners as wilful defaulters is sustainable when the show-cause notice was issued only to the company and not to the petitioners individually, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that show-cause notice was served only on the company, not on them individually, violating natural justice. Respondents argued that notice to company was sufficient as petitioners were directors.

Ratio Decidendi

A show-cause notice must be served individually on each person sought to be declared a wilful defaulter; service on the company alone is insufficient and violates principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The show-cause notice was issued only to the Company and not to the petitioners individually. The petitioners were, therefore, not afforded any opportunity of hearing before the impugned orders were made. The impugned orders are unsustainable and are hereby quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2281 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the WDIC order dated 07.12.2020 and Review Committee order dated 26.03.2021. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 01.12.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Procedural Irregularities and Denial of Opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits after the Single Judge dismissed the writ petition without...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bail Granted to Accused in Extortion and Forgery Case — Bail Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 41A CrPC Notice and Lack of Application of Mind. The court held that the trial court's order granting bail ...