Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Refusal of Technical Clearance for Construction in Settlement Zone — Conversion Sanad Not Required for Non-Agricultural Use in Settlement Zone Under Goa Land Use Regulations. The Court held that once property is zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan, the conversion sanad is not necessary for construction, and refusal on that ground is unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 23.08.2018 passed by respondent no.2, the Deputy Town Planner, refusing to issue technical clearance for proposed construction in his property bearing Survey No.18/4 of Village Aldona, Bardez-Goa. The property, known as 'Dragachem Bata' or 'Mainwado', admeasuring about 1400 square metres, was originally agricultural land. In 1986, the petitioner's predecessors in title obtained a conversion sanad dated 28.05.1986 for the property. Subsequently, in the Regional Plan for Goa 2001, the property was zoned as 'settlement'. On 24.04.2017, the petitioner applied to respondent no.2 for technical clearance for construction, submitting documents including the conversion sanad and RTI-obtained documents of an adjacent property to show topographical similarities. The Deputy Town Planner refused the application solely on the ground that the conversion sanad issued in 1986 was no longer valid. The petitioner argued that since the property was zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan, the conversion sanad was not required for construction, and the refusal was arbitrary. The respondents contended that the conversion sanad was necessary and its invalidity justified the refusal. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Regional Plan, and held that once a property is zoned as 'settlement', the conversion sanad is not a prerequisite for obtaining technical clearance for construction. The impugned order was based on an irrelevant ground and was quashed. The Court directed respondent no.2 to reconsider the petitioner's application for technical clearance afresh, without insisting on a valid conversion sanad, and to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Technical Clearance - Conversion Sanad - The Deputy Town Planner refused technical clearance for construction on the ground that the conversion sanad issued in 1986 was no longer valid. The petitioner's property was zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan for Goa 2001. The Court held that once the property is zoned as 'settlement', the conversion sanad is not required for construction, and the refusal on that ground was unsustainable. (Paras 1-10)

B) Town Planning - Zoning - Settlement Zone - The Court observed that the Regional Plan zoning determines the permissible land use. Since the property was in a settlement zone, the petitioner was entitled to technical clearance for construction without needing a valid conversion sanad. The impugned order was quashed. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Deputy Town Planner could refuse technical clearance for construction on the ground that the conversion sanad issued in 1986 is no longer valid, when the property is zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 23.08.2018 is quashed and set aside. Respondent no.2 is directed to reconsider the petitioner's application for technical clearance afresh, without insisting on a valid conversion sanad, and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks from the date of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Conversion sanad is not required for construction in settlement zone
  • Technical clearance cannot be refused on ground of invalid conversion sanad if property is in settlement zone
  • Regional Plan zoning prevails over conversion sanad for non-agricultural use
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 121

Writ Petition No.81 of 2020

2021-12-09

Revati Mohite Dere, M. S. Jawalkar

2021:BHC-GOA:1379-DB

Petitioner in person, Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Prashil Arolkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3,5 & 6

Rajendra Gadge

State of Goa & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal of technical clearance for construction

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 23.08.2018 refusing technical clearance and direction to grant clearance

Filing Reason

Deputy Town Planner refused technical clearance on ground that conversion sanad issued in 1986 is no longer valid

Previous Decisions

Order dated 23.08.2018 by Deputy Town Planner refusing technical clearance

Issues

Whether the Deputy Town Planner could refuse technical clearance on the ground that the conversion sanad is no longer valid when the property is zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that since the property is zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan, conversion sanad is not required for construction. Respondents argued that the conversion sanad was necessary and its invalidity justified the refusal.

Ratio Decidendi

Once a property is zoned as 'settlement' in the Regional Plan, the conversion sanad is not required for construction, and refusal of technical clearance on the ground of invalid conversion sanad is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner in this petition seeks to challenge the order dated 23.08.2018, by which respondent no.2 - Deputy Town Planner refused to issue technical clearance for proposed construction in the property bearing Survey No.18/4 of Village Aldona, Bardez-Goa. It is refused on the ground that the conversion sanad issued in 1986 is no longer valid.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for technical clearance on 24.04.2017. The Deputy Town Planner refused the application by order dated 23.08.2018. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Refusal of Technical Clearance for Construction in Settlement Zone — Conversion Sanad Not Required for Non-Agricultural Use in Settlement Zone Under Goa Land Use Regulations. The Court held that once property is zon...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Providing Preference to Locals in Appointment of Peon in Private School — Schedule F to MEPS Rules Does Not Provide for Promotion but Only Preference. The Court held that the Government Resolution dat...