Search Results for "conversion sanad"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Civil Suit Pending Before Civil Court Must Be Decided First. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Directed to Await Civil Court Decision.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a mutation entry made in the revenue records in favor of the respondents. The dispute pertained to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Environmental Clearance for Resort Construction in CRZ Area Subject to Conditions — Public Trust Doctrine and Precautionary Principle Applied to Protect Coastal Ecology and Local Livelihoods.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation and connected writ petitions challenging the environmental clearance granted to M/s. Leading Hot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the suit property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The case involves a writ petition filed by legal heirs of the original petitioner, Mr. Limo Cortez, challenging the construction approval granted by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Limo Cortez, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...