Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cheating in Promise-to-Marry Case — Sexual Relationship Under False Promise of Marriage Constitutes Cheating Under Section 417 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kashinath Narayan Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for the offence punishable under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for cheating. The prosecution case was that the appellant had sexual relations with the prosecutrix (PW1) on the promise of marriage, but later refused to marry her. The trial court acquitted the appellant of the charge under Section 376 IPC (rape) but convicted him under Section 417 IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence. The High Court of Bombay heard the appeal. The court examined the evidence of PW1 (prosecutrix) and PW2 (her sister), which indicated a love affair and sexual relationship over about three years. The court noted that the evidence showed the appellant had made a promise of marriage, which he later broke. The court held that the conviction under Section 417 IPC was sustainable as the appellant had deceived the prosecutrix by making a false promise of marriage, inducing her to engage in sexual relations. The court found no reason to interfere with the trial court's findings. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Cheating - Section 417 IPC - False Promise of Marriage - The appellant was convicted under Section 417 IPC for having sexual relations with the prosecutrix on the false promise of marriage. The court held that the evidence of the prosecutrix and her sister established a love affair and sexual relationship over three years, and the accused subsequently refused to marry. The conviction under Section 417 was upheld as the promise was false from the inception. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's conviction under Section 417 IPC for cheating by falsely promising marriage is sustainable on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 417 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Promise of marriage as a false pretext for sexual relationship constitutes cheating under Section 417 IPC
  • Consent obtained by deception is not valid consent for sexual intercourse
  • Acquittal under Section 376 IPC does not preclude conviction under Section 417 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 65

Criminal Appeal No.119 of 1999

2021-12-09

Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Ms Vrishali Raje for the Appellant, Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for Respondent-State

Kashinath Narayan Gharat

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for cheating under Section 417 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and sentence under Section 417 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court for cheating the prosecutrix by falsely promising marriage and having sexual relations with her.

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted appellant under Section 376 IPC but convicted under Section 417 IPC and sentenced to one year RI and fine of Rs.5000/-.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 417 IPC is sustainable on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the conviction under Section 417 IPC was not sustainable. Respondent-State supported the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

A conviction under Section 417 IPC for cheating by false promise of marriage is sustainable when the evidence shows that the accused made a false promise of marriage to induce the prosecutrix to engage in sexual relations, and the promise was broken later.

Judgment Excerpts

The evidence of PW1- Prosecutrix reveals that the accused was known to her. She had sexual relationship with the accused for over about 3 years. The evidence on record thus indicates that sexual relationship between the prosecutrix and the accused was a result of love affair and not on account of any false promise of marriage.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No.334 of 1996 on 19/02/1999 for offence under Section 417 IPC. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay under Section 374 CrPC.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 417, 376
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 374, 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Stepmother's Murder Case. Conviction overturned due to unreliable witness testimonies and insufficient evidence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Deceased Passenger in Railways Act Case — Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Missing Ticket. The Court held that circumstantial evidence, including police inquest report and witness testimony,...