Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate in 'Thakur' Tribe Claim Case. Committee Failed to Consider Contemporaneous Documents and Affidavits, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sunil Hiraman Thakur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12-04-2018 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar (respondent no.2), which invalidated his Scheduled Tribe certificate claiming 'Thakur' tribe. The petitioner had obtained a Scheduled Tribe certificate on 24-08-2000 from the Sub-Divisional Officer, Amalner, certifying that he belongs to the 'Thakur' tribe, recognized as Scheduled Tribe under Sr. No.44 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. He was appointed as Shikshan Sevak in Sharada Madhyamik School, Kalamsare on 25-07-2004, but his services were terminated on 09-08-2005 for non-submission of a validity certificate. The petitioner applied to the Scrutiny Committee for verification of his tribe claim. The Committee, by the impugned order, invalidated the certificate. The petitioner contended that the Committee did not consider the contemporaneous documents such as school records, revenue entries, and affidavits of his relatives, which supported his claim. The High Court examined the record and found that the Committee had not properly considered these documents. The Court held that the impugned order was unsustainable and set it aside. The matter was remanded to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration, with a direction to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to consider all relevant documents. The Court also directed that the petitioner's services should not be terminated on the basis of the impugned order until the Committee passes a fresh order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Scheduled Tribe Certificate Validity - Natural Justice - Consideration of Evidence - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe certificate without adequately considering the school records, revenue entries, and affidavits of relatives that supported the tribe claim - Held that the Committee failed to apply its mind to the contemporaneous documents and the impugned order was unsustainable (Paras 10-12).

B) Service Law - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Remand - When a Scrutiny Committee passes an order without proper consideration of evidence, the High Court can set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh consideration - Held that the matter be remitted to the Committee for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner (Paras 13-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the petitioner's 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe certificate without properly considering the contemporaneous documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 12-04-2018 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration. The Committee shall give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and consider all relevant documents including the contemporaneous documents and affidavits. The petitioner's services shall not be terminated on the basis of the impugned order until the Committee passes a fresh order. Rule made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Scheduled Tribe certificate validity
  • consideration of contemporaneous documents
  • affidavit evidence
  • remand for fresh consideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (03) 20

WRIT PETITION NO.8513 OF 2018

2021-03-22

Ujjal Bhuyan, M.G. Sewlikar

K.T. Shirurkar, Geeta Deshpande, M.G. Kochar, B.R. Warma

Sunil S/o Hiraman Thakur

State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar, Sub-Divisional Officer, Amalner, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, President, Kalamsare Vidya Prasarak Sanstha, Head Master, Sharda Madhyamik School

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 12-04-2018 passed by the Scrutiny Committee and direction to issue validity certificate to the petitioner as belonging to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe community, and direction not to take adverse action against the petitioner based on the impugned order.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate without properly considering the contemporaneous documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed the impugned order dated 12-04-2018 invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate without proper consideration of evidence. Whether the impugned order is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Scrutiny Committee did not consider the contemporaneous documents such as school records, revenue entries, and affidavits of relatives which supported his tribe claim. Respondents argued in support of the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant contemporaneous documents and affidavits before invalidating a Scheduled Tribe certificate. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable and the matter must be remanded for fresh consideration.

Judgment Excerpts

The Scrutiny Committee has not considered the contemporaneous documents such as school records, revenue entries and affidavits of the relatives of the petitioner which were produced before it. In the absence of consideration of the aforesaid documents, the impugned order cannot be sustained. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a Scheduled Tribe certificate on 24-08-2000. He was appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 25-07-2004 but terminated on 09-08-2005 for non-submission of validity certificate. He applied to the Scrutiny Committee for verification. The Committee passed the impugned order on 12-04-2018 invalidating the certificate. The petitioner filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950: Sr. No.44
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition for Remission Under Government Resolution Dated 3.6.2017 — Convict Under MCOCA Excluded from Remission Scheme. Convict convicted under Sections 395, 397 r/w 34 IPC and Section 3 of MCOCA not entitled t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate in 'Thakur' Tribe Claim Case. Committee Failed to Consider Contemporaneous Documents and Affidavits, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.