Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Declaration Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme — Quantification of Tax Dues Not Required to Be Final by Cut-Off Date for Cases Under Investigation. The Court held that Section 124(1)(d) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 does not require final quantification by 30.06.2019 for declarants under investigation, enquiry or audit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. K. N. Rai, a proprietorship firm engaged in works contract services, was registered under the Finance Act, 1994. Its services were initially exempt from service tax under an exemption notification dated 20.06.2012. However, following amendments, certain services became taxable from 01.04.2015. The Service Tax Department initiated an enquiry against the petitioner for the period 2014-15 to June 2017. During the enquiry, the proprietor admitted a service tax liability of Rs.1,26,54,725.00 in a statement recorded on 28.06.2019, but could not pay due to financial crisis. Meanwhile, the Central Government introduced the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 under the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 to settle pending disputes under the erstwhile indirect tax regime. The petitioner expressed willingness to apply under the Scheme and submitted a declaration on 21.11.2019 under the category of investigation, enquiry or audit, mentioning duty payable at Rs.1,25,54,725.00. The respondents rejected the declaration on 12.02.2020 on the ground that quantification of tax dues was not made final by 30.06.2019, the cut-off date. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The respondents contended that under Section 124(1)(d) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, the amount payable must be quantified on or before 30.06.2019. The Court examined the provisions of the Scheme and held that the condition of final quantification by 30.06.2019 applies only to cases where a show cause notice has been issued, not to cases under investigation, enquiry or audit. Since the petitioner's case fell under investigation, the rejection was unsustainable. The Court quashed the rejection order and directed the respondents to reconsider the declaration after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

Headnote

A) Indirect Tax - Sabka Vishwas Scheme - Eligibility - Section 124(1)(d) Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 - The issue was whether a declarant under investigation is eligible under the Scheme even if quantification of tax dues was not finalized by the cut-off date of 30.06.2019 - The Court held that the condition of final quantification by 30.06.2019 applies only to cases where a show cause notice has been issued, not to cases under investigation, enquiry or audit - The rejection was quashed and the respondents were directed to reconsider the declaration after granting opportunity of hearing (Paras 2-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the ground that quantification of tax dues was not made final by 30.06.2019 is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order dated 12.02.2020, and directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme after granting an opportunity of hearing.

Law Points

  • Sabka Vishwas Scheme
  • eligibility
  • quantification of tax dues
  • cut-off date
  • investigation
  • enquiry
  • audit
  • Section 124(1)(d) Finance (No.2) Act 2019
  • opportunity of hearing
  • natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 26

Writ Petition (L) No.3561 of 2020

2021-01-07

Ujjal Bhuyan, Abhay Ahuja

Mr. Avinash Poddar a/w Ms. Deepali Kamble (for Petitioner), Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Ram Ochani (for Respondents)

M/s. K. N. Rai (Proprietorship firm) Through Kirit Kedarnath Rai

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging rejection of declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 12.02.2020 rejecting the declaration and direction to reconsider after granting opportunity of hearing.

Filing Reason

Rejection of declaration on the ground that quantification of tax dues was not made final by 30.06.2019.

Previous Decisions

Declaration rejected by respondent No.2 on 12.02.2020.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme on the ground that quantification of tax dues was not made final by 30.06.2019 is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that its case fell under investigation/enquiry and the condition of final quantification by 30.06.2019 applies only to cases where show cause notice has been issued. Respondents argued that under Section 124(1)(d) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, the amount payable must be quantified on or before 30.06.2019.

Ratio Decidendi

The condition of final quantification by 30.06.2019 under Section 124(1)(d) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 applies only to cases where a show cause notice has been issued, not to cases under investigation, enquiry or audit. Therefore, the rejection of the petitioner's declaration was unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 12.02.2020 issued by respondent No.2 rejecting the declaration of the petitioner under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. On 12.02.2020 petitioner received a letter from respondent No.2 intimating that its declaration was rejected on the ground that quantification of the tax dues was not made final by 30.06.2019 which was the cut off date.

Procedural History

The petitioner submitted a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme on 21.11.2019. The respondents rejected the declaration on 12.02.2020. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date. The petition was reserved on 16.12.2020 and pronounced on 07.01.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance (No.2) Act, 2019: 124(1)(d)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Finance Act, 1994:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Declaration Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme — Quantification of Tax Dues Not Required to Be Final by Cut-Off Date for Cases Under Investigation. The Court held that Section 124(1)(d) of Fin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, recovery, and last seen theory beyond reasonable do...