Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Approval for Lady Superintendent Appointment in Ashram School. Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Order Quashed and Matter Remanded.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ku. Veena d/o Guruprasad Thakur, a permanent resident of District-Gondia with qualifications M.A. and M.S.W., belongs to the Other Backward Class category. Pursuant to a Government Resolution dated 26.02.2014, the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, vide communication dated 13.03.2014, directed the managements of Ashram Schools to fill the posts of Lady Superintendent and Security Personnel within two months by following due procedure. Respondent No.3, Bhagwati Shikshan Sanstha, appointed the petitioner as Lady Superintendent in Respondent No.4 School from 01.08.2014. However, the Additional Commissioner, by order dated 04.07.2017, declined approval to the petitioner's appointment. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition. The court noted that the impugned order was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that the order could not be sustained and set it aside, remanding the matter to the Additional Commissioner for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The court directed that the petitioner be heard within four weeks from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Denial of Approval - The Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, declined approval to the petitioner's appointment as Lady Superintendent without giving her an opportunity of hearing. The court held that such an order, being adverse to the petitioner, could not have been passed without affording her a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and thus quashed the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order declining approval to the petitioner's appointment as Lady Superintendent, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 04.07.2017, and remanded the matter to the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nagpur for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard, to be decided within four weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Opportunity of Hearing
  • Approval of Appointment
  • Government Resolution dated 26.02.2014
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 133

Writ Petition No.6539 of 2019

2022-12-15

Sandeep K. Shinde, Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi

Shri I.N. Choudhari for Petitioner, Shri A.M. Kadukar for Respondent Nos.1,2,5, Shri R.M. Wasnik for Respondent Nos.3,4

Ku. Veena d/o Guruprasad Thakur

State of Maharashtra, Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Bhagwati Shikshan Sanstha, Ravindranath Tagore Primary and Secondary Ashram School, Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development declining approval to the petitioner's appointment as Lady Superintendent.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 04.07.2017 and direction to approve the appointment.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's appointment as Lady Superintendent was not approved by the Additional Commissioner without giving her an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nagpur declined approval vide order dated 04.07.2017.

Issues

Whether the order declining approval to the petitioner's appointment as Lady Superintendent, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the impugned order was passed without giving her an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the order was passed in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

An order adverse to a person cannot be passed without affording that person an opportunity of being heard, as it violates the principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The order impugned in this petition, therefore, cannot be sustained and is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner was appointed on 01.08.2014. The Additional Commissioner declined approval on 04.07.2017. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.6539 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was heard and decided on 15.12.2022.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Approval for Lady Superintendent Appointment in Ashram School. Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Order Quashed and Matter Remanded.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.