Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Co-operative Society Seeking Reservation in MHADA Commercial Complexes. Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 does not apply to MHADA as it is not a local body or government undertaking under the resolution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jay Bhawani Sawamrojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, a co-operative society of educated unemployed persons registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition seeking reservation in commercial complexes being constructed by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and its boards (respondents 2 to 7). The petitioner relied on a Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002, which, according to the petitioner, provides for reservation of 10% of commercial premises for such societies. The petitioner argued that this policy is in line with the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and the rules and regulations thereunder. The respondents opposed the petition, contending that the Government Resolution does not apply to MHADA as it is a statutory authority and not a local body or government undertaking. The court examined the Government Resolution and noted that it applies to constructions by local bodies and government undertakings. MHADA is a statutory authority established under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and is not a local body or a government undertaking. Therefore, the resolution does not apply to MHADA. The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner cannot claim reservation under the said Government Resolution.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Government Resolution - Applicability - Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 - The resolution provides for reservation of 10% commercial premises for co-operative societies of educated unemployed persons in constructions by local bodies and government undertakings. MHADA is a statutory authority and not a local body or government undertaking, hence the resolution does not apply to MHADA. (Paras 3-5)

B) Co-operative Societies - Reservation - Government Policy - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The petitioner, a co-operative society of educated unemployed persons, claimed reservation in MHADA commercial complexes. The court held that the Government Resolution does not apply to MHADA, and the society cannot claim reservation under the resolution. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002, which provides for reservation of 10% commercial premises for co-operative societies of educated unemployed persons, applies to the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) and its boards.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 does not apply to MHADA as it is not a local body or government undertaking.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Government Resolution
  • Applicability of Government Resolution to statutory authorities
  • Reservation policy for co-operative societies of educated unemployed persons
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 5

WRIT PETITION NO. 12293 OF 2022

2022-12-12

Mangesh S. Patil, Y. G. Khobragade

Mr. Abhijit C. Darandale (for petitioner), Mr. A.R. Kale (AGP for respondent State), Mr. A.B. Kadethankar (for respondents 2 to 7)

Jay Bhawani Sawamrojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit

The State of Maharashtra, The Vice-President and Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, Mumbai, The Dy. Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, Mumbai, The Chief Engineer-I, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority, Mumbai, The Chief Officer, Nashik Housing and Area Development Board, Nashik, The Executive Engineer, Nashik Housing and Area Development Board, Nashik, The Dy. Engineer, Nagar Sub-Division, Nashik Housing and Area Development Board, Ahmednagar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking reservation in commercial complexes constructed by MHADA.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a direction to the respondents to reserve 10% of commercial premises for the petitioner society as per Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002.

Filing Reason

The petitioner claimed that the respondents were not providing reservation as per the Government Resolution.

Issues

Whether the Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 applies to MHADA.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 provides for reservation of 10% commercial premises for co-operative societies of educated unemployed persons and that this policy is in tune with the MHADA Act and rules. Respondents contended that the Government Resolution does not apply to MHADA as it is a statutory authority and not a local body or government undertaking.

Ratio Decidendi

The Government Resolution dated 17 August 2002 applies only to local bodies and government undertakings. MHADA is a statutory authority and not a local body or government undertaking, hence the resolution does not apply to MHADA.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is a co-operative society of educated unemployed persons duly registered as such under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. It is claiming reservation in the commercial complexes being constructed by the respondents nos. 2 to 7 pursuant to the Government resolution dated 17 August 2002. The learned advocate for the petitioner Mr. Darandale adverts our attention to the Government resolution dated 17 August 2002 and particularly clause no. 5 to submit that the Government has decided to reserve 10% of the commercial premises being constructed by the local bodies and the Government undertaking and further stipulating that the societies shall not be required to purchase the shops but to allot them the shops on concessional rent. He would submit that this policy is in tune with the provisions of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter ‘the MHADA Act’), Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Disposal of Land) Rules, 1981 (hereinafter ‘the Rules’) as well as the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Estate Managements, Sale, Transfer and Exchange of Tenements) Regulations, 1981 (hereinafter ‘the Regulations’).

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith. The matter was heard finally at the stage of admission with the consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960:
  • Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976:
  • Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Disposal of Land) Rules, 1981:
  • Maharashtra Housing and Area Development (Estate Managements, Sale, Transfer and Exchange of Tenements) Regulations, 1981:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Advanced Pregnancy Due to Grave Risk to Mother and Fetal Abnormalities. Medical Board Opinion of Significant Morbidity to Child and Mental Health Injury to Mother Justifies Permission Under Medical Termination ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction Order Under MCOC Act for Lack of Satisfaction Regarding Organized Crime Syndicate. Sanction under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 set aside as the sanctioning authority failed to re...