Search Results for "MHADA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "MHADA"

257 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenants Against Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Dispute — Held That Tenants Cannot Be Evicted Without Proper Rehabilitation Under MHADA and Cooperative Housing Society Bye-Laws.

2 Sep 2016

The judgment pertains to a group of appeals filed by tenants (Pramod Jamnadas Gokani, Upendra Lallubhai Shah, Priti Pramod Gokani, and Kamlesh Jayant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order Refusing Commencement Certificate Based on Ministerial Assurance. Ministerial Assurance Cannot Override Statutory Provisions Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

11 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rustomjee Realty Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of MHADA Employee — Transfer Held to Be Administrative Decision Not Subject to Strict Judicial Review Unless Mala Fide or Violative of Statutory Rules.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Balkrishna Dattatraya Joshi, was an employee of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) working at Dhule. He wa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Redevelopment Case Upholding High Court's Decision on Writ Petition Maintainability. Court Finds No Interference with Contractual Rights as Agreements Were Unregistered and MHADA Had Authority Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2034 to Issue E-Tender for Private Land Redevelopment.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) for the redevelopment of a privately owned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)