Supreme Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Cruelty and Adultery Case — Irretrievable Breakdown Not a Ground for Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Court holds that allegations of adultery and cruelty must be proved by evidence, and irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a statutory ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

  • 173
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the husband's appeal against the Family Court's order rejecting his divorce petition. The appellant-husband, an Indian Army officer, and the respondent-wife, a qualified dentist, were married on 19 April 2017. Due to marital discord, the wife moved out of the matrimonial home, alleging the husband's adultery. She made an application under Section 90(i) of the Army Act, 1950 for maintenance, which was granted and deductions were made from the husband's salary until September 2019. On 1 October 2018, she filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, alleging mental and physical harassment and domestic violence. On 24 November 2018, she filed a criminal complaint with the Mahila Thana, Noida. On 29 November 2019, she instituted proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for maintenance. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on grounds of cruelty and adultery. The Family Court dismissed the petition, and the High Court upheld that decision. The Supreme Court considered whether the husband had proved cruelty and adultery. The Court noted that the husband's allegations of cruelty were based on the wife's filing of legal proceedings and her allegations of adultery against him. However, the Court held that the wife's actions were not proven to be false or malicious, and the husband failed to provide evidence that the wife's conduct caused him mental cruelty. Regarding adultery, the husband's allegations were vague and unsupported by any evidence. The Court also rejected the argument that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, holding that irretrievable breakdown is not a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the lower courts.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty - Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant-husband alleged mental cruelty by the respondent-wife, including false allegations of adultery and filing of multiple legal proceedings. The Court held that the allegations of cruelty must be proved by cogent evidence, and the mere filing of proceedings by the wife does not constitute cruelty unless actuated by malice or falsehood. The husband failed to prove that the wife's actions caused reasonable apprehension in his mind that it would be harmful or injurious to live with her. (Paras 2-10)

B) Family Law - Divorce - Adultery - Section 13(1)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant-husband alleged adultery by the respondent-wife, but failed to provide any evidence to substantiate the claim. The Court held that the burden of proof lies on the person alleging adultery, and mere suspicion or conjecture is insufficient. The husband's allegations were vague and unsupported, and thus the ground of adultery was not established. (Paras 2-10)

C) Family Law - Divorce - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Not a statutory ground under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant-husband argued that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to prolonged separation and lack of cohabitation. The Court held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the court cannot grant divorce on that basis unless the legislature amends the law. The power to dissolve a marriage on this ground lies with Parliament, not the judiciary. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-husband is entitled to a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and adultery under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and whether irretrievable breakdown of marriage can be a ground for divorce.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the judgment of the Allahabad High Court and the Family Court, and denied the decree of divorce.

Law Points

  • Cruelty must be proved by evidence
  • Adultery must be proved by evidence
  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act
  • Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
  • Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
  • Section 90(i) of Army Act
  • 1950
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 INSC 577

Civil Appeal No. of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.971 of 2025)

2026-01-01

Vikram Nath, J.

2026 INSC 577

Salil Dhawan

Priyanshi Ghai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of divorce petition by Family Court and High Court.

Remedy Sought

The appellant-husband sought a decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty and adultery under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Filing Reason

The appellant-husband alleged mental cruelty and adultery by the respondent-wife, and claimed that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

Previous Decisions

The Family Court dismissed the divorce petition. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the Family Court order.

Issues

Whether the appellant-husband proved cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether the appellant-husband proved adultery under Section 13(1)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether irretrievable breakdown of marriage is a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant-husband argued that the respondent-wife's false allegations of adultery and filing of multiple legal proceedings amounted to mental cruelty. The appellant-husband alleged that the respondent-wife committed adultery, but provided no evidence. The appellant-husband contended that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to prolonged separation and lack of cohabitation. The respondent-wife denied all allegations and submitted that the husband failed to prove cruelty or adultery.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that cruelty and adultery must be proved by cogent evidence, and the mere filing of legal proceedings by the wife does not constitute cruelty unless proven false or malicious. Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the court cannot grant divorce on that basis.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 3rd October 2024 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in First Appeal No. 930/2024, whereby the High Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the order of the Family Court dismissing the divorce petition. The marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife was solemnised on 19th April 2017, in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies. The appellant-husband is an officer in the Indian Army, and the respondent-wife is a qualified doctor (B.D.S.). Owing to marital discord, the respondent-wife moved out of the matrimonial home. She attributed the breakdown of the marriage to the appellant-husband's alleged adultery. On 30th April 2018, the respondent-wife made an application before the Army Authorities seeking monthly maintenance under Section 90(i) of the Army Act, 1950. On 1st October 2018, alleging mental and physical harassment and domestic violence, the respondent-wife filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. On 24th November 2018, the respondent-wife filed a criminal complaint with the Mahila Thana, P.S. Noida. On 29th November 2019, the respondent-wife instituted proceedings under Section 125 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Procedural History

The appellant-husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, which was dismissed. The husband appealed to the Allahabad High Court in First Appeal No. 930/2024, which was dismissed on 3rd October 2024. The husband then filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, which was converted into Civil Appeal No. of 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Section 12
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
  • Army Act, 1950: Section 90(i)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Cruelty and Adultery Case — Irretrievable Breakdown Not a Ground for Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Court holds that allegations of adultery and cruelty must be proved by evidence, and ir...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reinstates Criminal Proceedings in Land Fraud Case Under IPC and CrPC. High Court's quashing of FIR set aside as allegations of fraud, forgery, and cheating disclosed cognizable offences requiring investigation, irrespective of civil re...