Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices. Arbitration Agreement Found Valid Through Sales Terms and Conditions on Website and Invoices Accepted by Respondent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd., a distributor of computer products, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral tribunal to resolve disputes with the respondent, Mohit Raghuram Hegde, proprietor of Creative Infotech, regarding non-payment of dues under various invoices. The applicant contended that the arbitration agreement was contained in the 'Sales terms and conditions' available on its website www.imonline.co.in, which the respondent had consciously accepted, and also in the invoices raised by the applicant. The respondent opposed the application, arguing that there was no valid arbitration agreement as the terms were not specifically agreed upon. The court examined the facts and found that the respondent had accepted the invoices and acted upon them, thereby accepting the terms and conditions including the arbitration clause. The court held that a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties and allowed the application, appointing a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Dispute pertained to non-payment of dues under invoices - Applicant sought appointment of arbitrator based on arbitration clause in Sales Terms and Conditions on website and invoices - Court examined whether arbitration agreement existed - Held that the respondent's conduct in accepting invoices and continuing business constituted acceptance of the arbitration clause, thus a valid arbitration agreement exists (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there exists a valid arbitration agreement between the parties so as to warrant appointment of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • existence of arbitration agreement
  • acceptance of terms through conduct
  • web-based terms and conditions
  • invoices containing arbitration clause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (08) 88

Commercial Arbitration Application No. 235 of 2021

2022-08-30

G.S. Kulkarni, J.

2022:BHC-OS:7125

Mr. Kedar Wagle a/w. Sagar Wagle i/b. Riddhi A. Pandit for the applicant. Mr. Nishant Sasidhar a/w. Viral Thakur i/b. L.J. Law for the respondent.

Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd.

Mohit Raghuram Hegde, Proprietor Creative Infotech

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial arbitration application for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought appointment of an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate disputes regarding non-payment of dues.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties regarding non-payment of applicant's dues under various invoices.

Issues

Whether there exists a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant contended that arbitration agreement is contained in Sales terms and conditions on its website and in invoices, which were accepted by respondent. Respondent opposed, arguing no valid arbitration agreement existed as terms were not specifically agreed upon.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's conduct in accepting invoices and continuing business constituted acceptance of the arbitration clause contained therein, thus a valid arbitration agreement exists under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 whereby the applicant has prayed for appointment of an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties. The applicant contends that disputes and differences have arisen between the parties as regards non-payment of applicant's dues under various invoices as issued by the applicant to the respondent.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Commercial Arbitration Application No. 235 of 2021 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court reserved judgment on June 30, 2022, and pronounced on August 30, 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Removal of Trustees Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act — Proceedings Against Deceased Persons Renders Order Illegal. The court held that continuing proceedings against dead persons violates natural justice a...