Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Civil Suit Remedy Available for Title Disputes Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Mutation entries do not confer title and revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title; proper remedy is civil suit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Jagannath Khanderao Kedar and Indumati Khanderao Kedar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the mutation entries made in the revenue records in respect of certain agricultural lands. The respondents, including Gopinath Bhimaji Kedar and others, were the beneficiaries of the mutation entries. The petitioners contended that the mutation entries were illegal and without jurisdiction. The court noted that a civil suit regarding the title to the property was already pending between the parties. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that revenue authorities are not competent to adjudicate title disputes. The proper remedy for the petitioners was to pursue the civil suit. The court dismissed the petition, stating that it would not interfere under Article 227 when a civil suit is pending.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Mutation Entry - Title Dispute - Section 149 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - The petitioners challenged mutation entries made in revenue records in favor of respondents. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes. The proper remedy is a civil suit. Since a civil suit was already pending, the petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 227 of the Constitution of India - The court declined to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 as the dispute involved questions of title which are to be decided by a civil court. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court should interfere with mutation entries in revenue records under Article 227 of the Constitution when a civil suit is pending regarding title.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was dismissed. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes. The proper remedy is a civil suit, which was already pending.

Law Points

  • Mutation entry does not confer title
  • Civil suit is appropriate remedy for title disputes
  • Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (06) 31

Writ Petition No.6355 of 2019

2022-06-14

2022:BHC-AS:11341

Jagannath Khanderao Kedar and Indumati Khanderao Kedar @ Indumati Laxman Mankar

Gopinath Bhimaji Kedar @ Gopinath Bhagwant Mohite and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries in revenue records.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash mutation entries made in favor of respondents in revenue records.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that mutation entries were illegal and without jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

A civil suit regarding title to the property was pending between the parties.

Issues

Whether the High Court should interfere with mutation entries in revenue records under Article 227 when a civil suit is pending.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that mutation entries were illegal and without jurisdiction. Respondents likely argued that mutation entries are valid and that the civil suit is the appropriate forum.

Ratio Decidendi

Mutation entries in revenue records do not confer title; revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes. The proper remedy for challenging title is a civil suit. The High Court will not interfere under Article 227 when a civil suit is pending.

Judgment Excerpts

Mutation entries do not confer title. Revenue authorities cannot adjudicate title disputes.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries. A civil suit regarding title was already pending between the parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: Section 149
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for alleged murder of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Civil Suit Remedy Available for Title Disputes Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Mutation entries do not confer title and revenue authoriti...