Search Results for "mutation entry"

427 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 427 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Refusal to Certify Mutation Entry in Favour of Legal Heirs. Revenue Authorities Cannot Refuse Certification Based on Title Dispute; Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title.

The petitioners, Dadbhai Amrubhai Varu and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Orders in Kachchh District for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Notice Under Land Revenue Code. Orders Passed Without Hearing Petitioner Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Kirit Mulji Shah, filed two Special Civil Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Heirs in Land Mutation Dispute — Orders Certification of Mutation Entries Despite Pending Civil Suit. Revenue Authorities Cannot Refuse Mutation Based on Disputed Title Without Adjudicating Succession Rights Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The present petition was filed by the heirs of the deceased Maniben Keshabhai Parmar, seeking a writ of mandamus to quash and set aside orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...