Search Results for "export obligation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "export obligation"

215 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 215 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

12 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of TUFS Guidelines and Export Obligation Extension Policy. Court upholds Textile Commissioner's power to impose conditions for extension of export obligation period under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) and holds that guidelines are not ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by textile exporters challenging the validity of guidelines issued by the Textile Commissioner under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Fiscal Penalty and Debarment Orders in Import-Export Dispute — Failure to Fulfill Export Obligation Not Attributed to Petitioner's Fault. Appellate Authority's Orders Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Petitioner's Contentions.

9 Mar 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Sudhir Diamonds, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of DFIA Application for Maize Starch Powder Export. Court holds that the product 'Maize Starch Powder' is not covered under SION entry E75 which specifies 'Maize Starch', and the petitioner failed to comply with the requirement of submitting proof of export within the prescribed time limit under the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in export business, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained.

20 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against RBI Guidelines Prohibiting Merchanting Trade in Banned Goods During Pandemic. Clause 2(iii) of the 2020 MTT Guidelines is a reasonable restriction under Article 19(6) as it serves the legitimate aim of preserving domestic PPE stocks and is not manifestly arbitrary.

6 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court upholding Clause 2(iii) of the Revised Guidelines on Merchanting Trade Transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)