Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Claimant. Claimant's failure to exercise reasonable care while alighting from a moving bus resulted in 50% reduction in compensation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 4th August 1998 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal in MAC No.44 of 1999, whereby the claim of respondent no.1 (claimant) was partly allowed against the appellant (Divisional Controller, MSRTC) and respondent no.2 (bus driver). The Tribunal directed the non-applicants to pay jointly and severally a sum of Rs.75,000/- (inclusive of no fault liability) with interest at 12% per annum. The claimant, a vegetable vendor, alleged that on 10th August 1996, while he was alighting from a bus of the appellant at Barbani, the bus driver suddenly started the bus, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The appellant contended that the claimant was negligent in alighting from a moving bus. The High Court found that the claimant failed to exercise due care and was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 50%. Consequently, the compensation was reduced to Rs.37,500/- (50% of Rs.75,000/-) and the interest rate was reduced from 12% to 6% per annum. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Standard of Care - Claimant alighted from a moving bus and suffered injuries - Held that the claimant failed to exercise reasonable care for his own safety, contributing to the accident - Contributory negligence assessed at 50% (Paras 5-7).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Reduction on Account of Contributory Negligence - Tribunal awarded Rs.75,000/- including no fault liability - High Court reduced compensation by 50% due to contributory negligence, awarding Rs.37,500/- with interest at 6% per annum instead of 12% (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the claimant was guilty of contributory negligence and whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was excessive.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation reduced to Rs.37,500/- (50% of Rs.75,000/-) with interest at 6% per annum from date of petition till realisation. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • No fault liability
  • Composite negligence
  • Standard of care for passengers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 135

First Appeal No. 64 of 1999

2010-06-29

A.P. Bhangale, J

Mr G.G. Mishra for appellant, Mr V.S. Dhobe for respondent no.1

The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Yavatmal

1) Sugram son of Sakharam Chawere, 2) Dalpat son of Narayan Rathod

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reduction of compensation on ground of contributory negligence

Filing Reason

Claimant suffered injuries while alighting from a bus; Tribunal awarded Rs.75,000/-

Previous Decisions

Tribunal partly allowed claim and directed payment of Rs.75,000/- with 12% interest

Issues

Whether the claimant was guilty of contributory negligence? Whether the compensation awarded was excessive?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the claimant was negligent in alighting from a moving bus and contributed to the accident. Claimant contended that the bus driver suddenly started the bus while he was alighting, causing the fall.

Ratio Decidendi

A claimant who alights from a moving bus without exercising reasonable care for his own safety is guilty of contributory negligence, and the compensation must be reduced proportionately.

Judgment Excerpts

The claimant failed to exercise due care and was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 50%. The compensation is reduced to Rs.37,500/- and interest rate reduced to 6% per annum.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yavatmal in MAC No.44 of 1999. Tribunal partly allowed claim on 4th August 1998. Appellant filed First Appeal No.64 of 1999 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Claimant. Claimant's failure to exercise reasonable care while alighting from a moving bus resulted in 50% reduction in compensation.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Shareholder Agreement Dispute Despite Respondent's Objections. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Prior Judgment Confirmed Validity of ...