Search Results for "retrospective policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "retrospective policy"

475 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Industrial Incentive Dispute — Concessional Electricity Rate Not Available to Existing Enterprises Undergoing Substantial Expansion Under Himachal Pradesh Industrial Policy, 2019. The Court held that Clause 16(a) of the Industrial Policy applies only to new enterprises, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to compel the State to provide incentives without an enabling notification.

25 May 2026

The State of Himachal Pradesh and its departments appealed against the High Court's judgment that directed them to provide concessional electricity ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Amendment to Sugar Exemption Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act — Imported Sugar Not Exempt. Retrospective amendment to Entry 31 of Fifth Schedule of KST Act, 1957, confining exemption to sugar produced or manufactured in India, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 301 of Constitution.

1 Jan 2026

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court which upheld a retrospective amendment to the exemption entry for 'sugar' under t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

9 Dec 2021

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: Promissory Estoppel Not Applicable Due to Lack of Clear Representation and Public Interest. The court held that the Industrial Policy 2012 did not create an enforceable right to retrospective exemption, and the notification under Section 9 of the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 was validly made prospective.

1 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had directed the State to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

30 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Health Insurance Renewal Petitions Against United India Insurance Company — Insurer Cannot Refuse Renewal Based on Pre-existing Disease Exclusion After Continuous Coverage Under Group Policy. The court held that the exclusion clause for pre-existing diseases applies only at the inception of the first policy and not at renewal, and that refusal to renew was arbitrary.

19 Aug 2013

The petitioners, account holders of Bank of Maharashtra, were covered under a group health insurance scheme called 'Mahabank Swasthya Yojna' provided ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)