Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Approval for Appointment as Principal in Minority Educational Institution. Appointment made without following statutory selection procedure under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and University Ordinances, and without prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education, held invalid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharanappa Chandramappa Hegde challenging the denial of approval for his appointment as Principal of Vidyan Mahavidyalaya Sangola, a minority educational institution run by Sangola Taluka Shetkari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. The petitioner was appointed as Principal by the management, but the Joint Director of Higher Education, Solapur Region, refused to grant prior approval on the ground that the selection was not made in accordance with the statutory procedure under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and the Ordinances of Solapur University. The University also initially granted approval but later withdrew it after the Joint Director's refusal. The petitioner argued that as a minority institution, the management had the right to appoint a Principal of its choice, and the statutory requirements were not applicable. The respondents, including the State, Joint Director, University, and the management, contended that the appointment was made without following the prescribed selection procedure, which includes advertising the post, constituting a selection committee, and obtaining prior approval from the Joint Director. The court examined the relevant provisions of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, the University Ordinances, and the Government Resolution dated 15th June 1995. The court held that the appointment of a Principal in a minority institution must comply with the statutory selection procedure to ensure merit and standards of education. The prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory, and the University cannot grant approval without such prior approval. The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the orders of the Joint Director and the University refusing approval. The court also directed the management to initiate fresh selection process in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Appointment of Principal - Minority Institution - Statutory Compliance - The appointment of a Principal in a minority educational institution must be made in accordance with the selection procedure prescribed under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and the relevant University Ordinances. Prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory before the University can grant approval to the appointment. The minority institution cannot bypass these statutory requirements. (Paras 1-16)

B) Education Law - Approval of Appointment - Joint Director of Higher Education - The Joint Director of Higher Education is the competent authority to grant prior approval for appointment of Principal. Without such approval, the University cannot grant approval to the appointment. The University's approval granted without prior approval of the Joint Director is invalid. (Paras 17-30)

C) Education Law - Minority Institution - Right to Administer - The right of minority institutions to administer their affairs is subject to regulatory measures for maintaining standards of education. Statutory requirements for appointment of Principal are regulatory in nature and do not infringe upon the minority character of the institution. (Paras 31-40)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of the petitioner as Principal of a minority college was valid without following the statutory selection procedure and without prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education, and whether the University could grant approval without such prior approval.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The orders of the Joint Director of Higher Education and the University refusing approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Principal are upheld. The management is directed to initiate fresh selection process in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Appointment of Principal in minority educational institution must comply with statutory selection procedure
  • prior approval of Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory
  • University cannot grant approval without Joint Director's approval
  • minority institution cannot bypass statutory requirements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 113

Writ Petition No. 4066 of 2021 with Writ Petition No. 6976 of 2022

2023-09-26

Sunil B. Shukre, Sandeep V. Marne

2023:BHC-AS:28197-DB

Mr. Chetan Patil for Petitioner in WP/4066/2021, Mr. Mandar Bagkar for Petitioner in WP/6976/2022, Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State, Ms. Kumud Bhatia for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in WP/4066/2021, Mr. Sanjay Thokade for Respondent No. 3 in WP/4066/2021, Mr. Rui A Rodrigues for Respondent No.7 UGS, Mr. I. M. Khairadi, a/w. Pramod Narayan Joshi for Respondent No.3 in WP/6976/2022

Shri. Sharanappa Chandramappa Hegde

The State of Maharashtra, Joint Director of Higher Education, Solapur Region, Solapur, Solapur University, Solapur, Sangola Taluka Shetkari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sangola, Vidyan Mahavidyalaya Sangola through Principal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the denial of approval for appointment as Principal of a minority college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the orders of the Joint Director of Higher Education and the University refusing approval to his appointment as Principal, and a direction to grant approval.

Filing Reason

The Joint Director of Higher Education refused to grant prior approval to the petitioner's appointment as Principal on the ground that the selection was not made in accordance with the statutory procedure. The University also withdrew its earlier approval.

Previous Decisions

The Joint Director of Higher Education, Solapur Region, by order dated 30th September 2021, refused to grant prior approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Principal. The University of Solapur by letter dated 30th September 2021 withdrew its earlier approval granted on 1st September 2021.

Issues

Whether the appointment of the petitioner as Principal of a minority college was valid without following the statutory selection procedure under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and University Ordinances? Whether the prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory before the University can grant approval to the appointment of a Principal? Whether a minority institution is exempt from complying with the statutory selection procedure for appointment of Principal?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the institution is a minority institution and has the right to appoint a Principal of its choice, and the statutory requirements are not applicable. Respondents argued that the appointment was made without following the prescribed selection procedure, which includes advertising the post, constituting a selection committee, and obtaining prior approval from the Joint Director of Higher Education.

Ratio Decidendi

The appointment of a Principal in a minority educational institution must comply with the statutory selection procedure prescribed under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and the relevant University Ordinances. Prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory before the University can grant approval to the appointment. The minority institution cannot bypass these statutory requirements as they are regulatory in nature and aimed at maintaining standards of education.

Judgment Excerpts

The appointment of a Principal in a minority institution must comply with the statutory selection procedure to ensure merit and standards of education. The prior approval of the Joint Director of Higher Education is mandatory, and the University cannot grant approval without such prior approval.

Procedural History

The petitioner was appointed as Principal by the management of Vidyan Mahavidyalaya Sangola. The Joint Director of Higher Education, Solapur Region, refused to grant prior approval on 30th September 2021. The University of Solapur initially granted approval on 1st September 2021 but withdrew it on 30th September 2021. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4066 of 2021 challenging these orders. Subsequently, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 6976 of 2022. Both petitions were heard together and dismissed by the High Court on 26th September 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Approval for Appointment as Principal in Minority Educational Institution. Appointment made without following statutory selection procedure under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order for Lack of Prior Approval Based on Recorded Reasons. Chief Minister's Discretion Under Para 9(b) of Government Order No.DPAR 22 STR 2013 is Not Absolute.