Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Outraging Modesty in Stone Attack Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, and medical evidence sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302 and 509 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 31
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vicky Amar Gomes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Ajay Kamble under Section 302 IPC and for outraging the modesty of the informant, Kajal Kamble (PW-1), under Section 509 IPC. The prosecution case was that the appellant, who resided on the same footpath as the informant and her family, repeatedly pestered the informant to marry him, leading to quarrels with her husband. On the night of 28th May 2012, after a quarrel, the appellant threatened the deceased and went to sleep. At around 5:00-5:30 am on 29th May 2012, the appellant awakened the informant and asked her to come with him to sleep. When she refused, he brought a big stone and hurled it on the head of the deceased, causing fatal injuries. The appellant was last seen near the spot. The trial court convicted him based on circumstantial evidence, including motive, last seen evidence, and medical evidence. The High Court, in appeal, upheld the conviction, finding that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the appellant's conduct of repeatedly demanding the informant to marry him and the quarrel with the deceased established motive. The medical evidence confirmed that the death was due to a head injury caused by a blunt object, consistent with the stone. The appellant's presence at the scene and his subsequent flight were also considered. The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the sentences of life imprisonment for murder and three months simple imprisonment for outraging modesty, with fines.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Circumstantial Evidence - Conviction based on motive, last seen together, and medical evidence - Appellant repeatedly demanded informant to marry him and quarreled with deceased - On the night of incident, appellant threatened deceased and later was seen near the spot - Stone used to cause fatal head injury - Held that prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-11).

B) Criminal Law - Outraging Modesty of Woman - Section 509 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant awakened informant and asked her to come with him to sleep - This act constituted an insult to the modesty of the woman - Held that conviction under Section 509 IPC is proper (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 509 IPC confirmed.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Outraging modesty of woman
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Motive
  • Last seen together
  • Medical evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 509 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 66

Criminal Appeal No. 550 of 2014

2023-03-28

A. S. Gadkari, Prakash D. Naik

Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan, Ms. G.P. Mulekar

Vicky Amar Gomes

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and outraging modesty of a woman.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 509 IPC for killing the husband of the informant after repeatedly demanding her to marry him.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 8th May 2014 in Sessions Case No. 735 of 2012.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence. Whether the conviction under Section 509 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and that the conviction was based on weak circumstantial evidence. Respondent-State argued that the prosecution proved motive, last seen, and medical evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the circumstantial evidence, including motive, last seen together, and medical evidence, was sufficient to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellant's conduct of repeatedly demanding the informant to marry him and the quarrel with the deceased established motive. The medical evidence confirmed the fatal head injury caused by a stone. The appellant's presence at the scene and subsequent flight further corroborated the prosecution case.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant has impugned Judgment and Order dated 8th May 2014 passed in Sessions Case No. 735 of 2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, convicting him under Sections 302 and 509 of Indian Penal Code. The informant Smt.Kajal A. Kamble (PW-1) with her husband Ajay Kamble (deceased) and son Yash was residing on a footpath... At about 5.00 to 5.30 am on 29th May 2012 Appellant awakened the informant (PW-1) from the sleep and asked her to come along with him to sleep.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried in Sessions Case No. 735 of 2012 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, who convicted him on 8th May 2014. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 550 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 28th March 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 509
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Outraging Modesty in Stone Attack Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, and medical evidence sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302 and 509 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.