Search Results for "outraging modesty"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Ramanna S/o Tirkappa Yerimani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Savanur in C.C. No. 04/2013 for offences under the Narcotic ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HR Managers in Workplace Harassment Case — Allegations of Outraging Modesty Under Sections 354, 509 IPC Not Made Out. Court Held That Absence of Sexual Overtone or Physical Contact Renders FIR Unsubstantiated, Abuse of Process of Law.

The petitioners, six individuals employed as HR managers and executives in a private company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 354 IPC for Lack of Criminal Intent in Workplace Incident. Touching of hands by Headmaster to discuss pending bills does not constitute assault or criminal force with intent to outrage modesty under Section 354 IPC.

The applicant, Dilip Uttam Lomate, was the Headmaster of an Ashram School. The respondent No.2, Vaishali Patil, was an Assistant Teacher. She alleged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Sexual Harassment Case for Lack of Physical Force Under Section 354 IPC. Allegations of SMS, calls, and verbal demands for sexual favours in lieu of fee exemption do not constitute 'assault or criminal force' as defined under Sections 349 and 350 IPC.

The applicant, Dr. Surajkumar Satyabrath Pal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Namdeo Dnyanaba Agarkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty and Assault in Revision Against Acquittal of Other Charges. Minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not discredit her credible evidence under Section 354 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rajesh Swarupchand Kankaria and others (original accused nos.1 to 3) challenging their c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Quashing of Proceedings in FIR for Alleged Outraging of Modesty: Absence of Intent Crucial" The Bombay High Court held that the absence of intent to outrage modesty negates the applicability of Section 354 IPC.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Indian Penal Code (IPC): Section 354 (Assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty). Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 354 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Outraging Modesty Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Umesh Dharamdas Landge, was convicted by the 6th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.558 of 2001 for an offen...