Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as dying declaration recorded without doctor's certification and lacked corroboration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by Pandurang Shankar Rajbhoj and Shobhabai Shankar Rajbhoj against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sheelabai, who died from burns. The prosecution's case was based primarily on a dying declaration recorded by Police Head Constable Shaikh at the hospital. The deceased had married Nagorao about a month before the incident. She alleged that appellant No.1 (brother-in-law) had quarreled with her and her husband, and that she was assaulted and set on fire. The trial court convicted the appellants. On appeal, the High Court examined the dying declaration and found that it was recorded without a doctor's certification that the deceased was in a fit state to give a statement. The court noted that the doctor who treated the deceased was not examined, and the dying declaration contained inconsistencies with the medical evidence. The court held that the dying declaration was not reliable and lacked corroboration. Consequently, the court set aside the conviction and acquitted the appellants, giving them the benefit of doubt.

Headnote

A) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Dying declaration recorded by Police Head Constable without obtaining doctor's certification regarding fitness of deceased to make statement - Held that such dying declaration is not reliable and cannot be sole basis for conviction without corroboration (Paras 10-15).

B) Criminal Law - Murder - Conviction based on dying declaration - Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellants convicted for murder of deceased by burning - Dying declaration inconsistent with medical evidence and other circumstances - Held that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, benefit of doubt given to accused (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration recorded by a police constable without doctor's certification is reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellants acquitted of all charges. Fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be recorded in presence of doctor certifying fitness
  • Dying declaration must be free from tutoring and corroborated
  • Benefit of doubt when prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 118

Criminal Appeal No.800 of 2015

2023-01-04

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Abhay S. Waghwase

Mr. A.M. Gaikwad for Appellants, Mr. A.M. Phule, A.P.P. for Respondent – State

Pandurang S/o Shankar Rajbhoj and Shobhabai w/o Shankar Rajbhoj

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, District-Parbhani on 7th September 2015 in Sessions Trial No.24 of 2012

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellants for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine

Issues

Whether the dying declaration recorded by a police constable without doctor's certification is reliable Whether the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that dying declaration was not recorded in presence of doctor and was unreliable Prosecution relied on dying declaration as sole basis for conviction

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded without certification by a doctor regarding the fitness of the deceased to make a statement is not reliable and cannot be the sole basis for conviction without corroboration. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

Present Appeal has been filed by the original accused persons challenging their conviction by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, District-Parbhani on 7th September 2015 in Sessions Trial No.24 of 2012, by holding them guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that deceased Sheelabai was married to one Nagorao Rajbhoj about a month prior to 16th May 2011.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellants on 7th September 2015. Appellants filed Criminal Appeal No.800 of 2015 before Bombay High Court. High Court allowed appeal on 4th January 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 34
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Attempted Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Unsupported Allegations. The court held that mere presence without active participation does not constitute an offence under Sections 36...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Detenu Under COFEPOSA — Detention Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 3(1) and Procedural Violations. Failure to Supply Relevant Documents and Consider Representation Renders Preventive ...