Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10B for Charitable Trust Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT Circular Relaxing Time Limit Applied Retrospectively. The court held that CBDT Circular No. 9/2014, which empowers the Commissioner to condone delay in filing Form 10B, applies retrospectively to pending assessments, and directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application on merits.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Al Jamia Mohammediyah Education Society, is a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. For Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17, it filed its return of income on 6 September 2016 declaring nil income and claiming a refund of Rs. 70,710/-. The trust's accounts were audited and the audit report was filed, but the trust failed to file Form No. 10B (the audit report in the prescribed form) along with the return. Form 10B was eventually filed on 15 February 2020, with a delay of approximately 1257 days. The trust then filed an application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) seeking condonation of the delay. The application was rejected by an order dated 28 March 2024 on the ground that the CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16 December 2014, which empowers the Commissioner to condone delays in filing Form 10B, applies only prospectively from the date of the circular and not to AY 2016-17. Aggrieved, the trust filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The legal issue was whether the CBDT circular applies retrospectively to pending assessments. The petitioner argued that the circular is procedural and beneficial and should be applied retrospectively, while the revenue contended that the circular is prospective and that the petitioner had an alternative remedy by way of appeal. The court held that the circular is procedural and beneficial in nature, and therefore applies retrospectively to pending assessments including AY 2016-17. The court also rejected the alternative remedy objection, noting that the issue was purely legal and involved interpretation of a circular. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Principal Commissioner to consider the petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) on its own merits, without rejecting it solely on the ground of delay. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Charitable Trust - Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10B - Section 119(2)(b) read with Section 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16.12.2014 - The petitioner, a charitable trust, filed its return of income for AY 2016-17 but filed Form 10B belatedly after 1257 days. The court held that the CBDT circular, which empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to condone delay in filing Form 10B, applies retrospectively to pending assessments. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) on merits, without rejecting it solely on the ground of delay. (Paras 1-8)

B) Income Tax - CBDT Circular - Retrospective Application - Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16.12.2014 - The court interpreted that the circular, which relaxes the time limit for filing Form 10B, is procedural and beneficial, and thus applies to pending assessments including AY 2016-17. The court relied on the principle that procedural circulars are retrospective unless expressly made prospective. (Paras 5-7)

C) Income Tax - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court rejected the revenue's objection that the petitioner should have availed alternative remedy, holding that the issue involved interpretation of a circular and was purely legal, warranting interference under Article 226. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing Form No.10B under Section 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be condoned under Section 119(2)(b) of the Act, and whether CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16.12.2014 applies retrospectively to Assessment Year 2016-17.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order dated 28 March 2024, and directed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to consider the petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on its own merits, without rejecting it solely on the ground of delay. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • CBDT Circular No. 9/2014
  • Form 10B
  • Charitable trust
  • Retrospective application of circular
  • Liberal construction of procedural provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 140

Writ Petition No. 1689 of 2024

2024-04-15

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-OS:6536-DB

Sham V. Walve, Tanzil Padvekar, Tejal Kharkar for Petitioner; Dinesh Gulabani, Prathmesh Bhosle for Respondent-Revenue

Al Jamia Mohammediyah Education Society

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the rejection of application under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 28 March 2024 rejecting its application under Section 119(2)(b) and a direction to the respondent to consider the application on merits.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B for AY 2016-17 was rejected by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) on the ground that CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 applies only prospectively.

Previous Decisions

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the petitioner's application under Section 119(2)(b) by order dated 28 March 2024.

Issues

Whether CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16.12.2014, which empowers the Commissioner to condone delay in filing Form 10B, applies retrospectively to Assessment Year 2016-17. Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the CBDT circular is procedural and beneficial, and therefore applies retrospectively to pending assessments. Reliance was placed on the principle that procedural circulars are retrospective unless expressly made prospective. Respondent argued that the circular is prospective and that the petitioner had an alternative remedy by way of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals).

Ratio Decidendi

CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 16.12.2014, which empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to condone delay in filing Form 10B under Section 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is procedural and beneficial in nature and therefore applies retrospectively to pending assessments. The circular does not create any new obligation but merely relaxes the time limit, and thus should be liberally construed to advance the object of the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The circular is procedural and beneficial in nature and therefore applies retrospectively to pending assessments. The circular does not create any new obligation but merely relaxes the time limit, and thus should be liberally construed to advance the object of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed its return of income for AY 2016-17 on 6 September 2016. Form 10B was filed belatedly on 15 February 2020. The petitioner then filed an application under Section 119(2)(b) before the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) for condonation of delay. The application was rejected by order dated 28 March 2024. The petitioner thereafter filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 15 April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 119(2)(b), 12A(1)(b)
  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act in Dispute Between LIC and NIC Over Rent Arrears and Damages. The court upheld the eviction of NIC from LIC's premises under Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10B for Charitable Trust Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT Circular Relaxing Time Limit Applied Retrospectively. The court held that CBDT Circular No. 9/2014, which e...